Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37702958›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

Lateral lymph node involvement presents another challenge in rectum cancer in the age of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + total mesorectal excision: an evaluation of survival outcomes.

Ümit Özdemir, Elif Gündoğdu, Melek Yakar, Funda Canaz, Murat Ulaş, İlter Özer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Quality assessment of surgery for colorectal cancer: Where do we stand?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ümit ÖzdemirDepartment of General Surgery, Section of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. uozdemir2001@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5681-7421
Elif GündoğduDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1729-6958
Melek YakarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9042-9489
Funda CanazDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-3876
Murat UlaşDepartment of General Surgery, Section of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3507-8647
İlter ÖzerDepartment of General Surgery, Section of Gastroenterological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6902-0913
Eskişehir Osmangazi University · TRMemorial Ankara Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the last decades, total mesorectal excision (TME) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) have produced an undeniable improvement in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, local recurrence is still an important problem, and the effect of lateral lymph node (LLN) involvement on local recurrence is a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of LLN status on local recurrence and survival in rectal cancers treated with nCRT + TME.

methodsClinical features, pre- and post-nCRT lateral pelvic region imaging, long-term local recurrence, and the survival outcomes of 114 patients who underwent nCRT + TME for rectal cancer were evaluated.

resultsOn MRI before nCRT, 20 (17.5%) patients had lateral lymph nodes (LLN+), and 94 (82.5%) patients had no lymph nodes in the lateral pelvic compartments (LLN-). Local recurrences at 1 year in LLN+ and LLN- patients were 3 (15.8%) and 2 (2.3%), respectively (p=0.039). Five-year local recurrence-free survival rates and the mean duration of recurrence-free survival in LLN+ and LLN- patients were 56.2%, 42.6 months, and 87.3% 66.9 months, respectively (p=0.001). Disease-free survival and overall survival were shorter in LLN+ patients, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.096 and p=0.46, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, LLN involvement was determined to be an independent risk factor for local recurrence-free survival (Hazard Ratio 4.54, p=0.003).

conclusionLateral lymph node involvement causes local recurrence to remain high after nCRT + TME. LLN status should be considered in treatment planning. Further studies are needed to define precise criteria for LLN involvement and the effect of LLND on local recurrence and survival.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalHumansLymph NodesMultivariate AnalysisLateral lymph nodesLocal recurrenceNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyRectal cancerTotal mesorectal excision

Identifiers

PMID37702958
OpenAlexW4386704061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.