Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37702936›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

In Silico Clinical Trials: Is It Possible?

Simon Arsène, Yves Parès, Eliott Tixier, Solène Granjeon-Noriot, Bastien Martin, Lara Bruezière, Claire Couty, Eulalie Courcelles, Riad Kahoul, Julie Pitrat and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Simon ArsèneNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Yves ParèsNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Eliott TixierNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Solène Granjeon-NoriotNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Bastien MartinNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Lara BruezièreNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Claire CoutyNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Eulalie CourcellesNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Riad KahoulNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Julie PitratNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Natacha GoNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Claudio MonteiroNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Julie Kleine-SchultjannNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Sarah JemaiNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Emmanuel PhamNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Jean-Pierre BoisselNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France.
Alexander KuleszaNovadiscovery SA, Lyon, France. alexander.kulesza@novadiscovery.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling and simulation (M&S), including in silico (clinical) trials, helps accelerate drug research and development and reduce costs and have coined the term "model-informed drug development (MIDD)." Data-driven, inferential approaches are now becoming increasingly complemented by emerging complex physiologically and knowledge-based disease (and drug) models, but differ in setup, bottlenecks, data requirements, and applications (also reminiscent of the different scientific communities they arose from). At the same time, and within the MIDD landscape, regulators and drug developers start to embrace in silico trials as a potential tool to refine, reduce, and ultimately replace clinical trials. Effectively, silos between the historically distinct modeling approaches start to break down. Widespread adoption of in silico trials still needs more collaboration between different stakeholders and established precedence use cases in key applications, which is currently impeded by a shattered collection of tools and practices. In order to address these key challenges, efforts to establish best practice workflows need to be undertaken and new collaborative M&S tools devised, and an attempt to provide a coherent set of solutions is provided in this chapter. First, a dedicated workflow for in silico clinical trial (development) life cycle is provided, which takes up general ideas from the systems biology and quantitative systems pharmacology space and which implements specific steps toward regulatory qualification. Then, key characteristics of an in silico trial software platform implementation are given on the example of jinkō.ai (nova's end-to-end in silico clinical trial platform). Considering these enabling scientific and technological advances, future applications of in silico trials to refine, reduce, and replace clinical research are indicated, ranging from synthetic control strategies and digital twins, which overall shows promise to begin a new era of more efficient drug development.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentKnowledge BasesComputer SimulationMemorySoftwareClinical trialsDigital twinsDrug developmentDrug regulationHealth technology assessmentIn silico trialsKnowledgeModeling and simulation (M&S)Software platformSynthetic control armsSystems biologySystems pharmacology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.