Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37702850›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2024

Randomized Controlled Trial of Neoadjuvant Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy Versus Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Comparison of Overall Response Rates.

Adila Amariyil, Sushmita Pathy, Atul Sharma, Sunil Kumar, Raja Pramanik, Sandeep Bhoriwal, R M Pandey

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adila AmariyilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dr BRA Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Sushmita PathyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dr BRA Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India. drspathy@gmail.com.
Atul SharmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sunil KumarDepartment of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Raja PramanikDepartment of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sandeep BhoriwalDepartment of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
R M PandeyDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INDR. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is evolving with current emphasis on the addition of chemotherapy to short course radiotherapy (SCRT). We primarily aimed to analyse the difference in overall response rates between SCRT with sequential chemotherapy and standard long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT)in LARC.

methodsAfter randomization, patients in arm A received 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with concurrent capecitabine while patients in arm B received 25 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week followed by 3 cycles of CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy. Clinical and radiological response assessment was made after the completion of neoadjuvant treatment, a week prior to surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was added to complete 6 months of peri-operative chemotherapy. Surgery was performed between 8 and 10 weeks of completion of radiation treatment in both arms.

resultsOf the 33 patients recruited in this study between February 2020 to July 2021, 17 patients were randomized to arm A and 16 to arm B. The rates of complete tumour regression were 23.1% in arm A versus 35.7% in arm B (p-value = 0.683). Pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 20% arm A versus 30% in arm B (0.446). A higher number of patients in arm B experienced grade 3 diarrhoea, whereas acute skin toxicity was seen only in arm A. SCRT had fewer treatment interruptions compared to LCCRT.

conclusionsSCRT followed by three cycles of CAPOX chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting is comparable to LCCRT in terms of tumour response. This may be a better alternative regimen with fewer treatment interruptions in a resource-limited setting.

Indexed as

CapecitabineChemoradiotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsConsolidation ChemotherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxaliplatinTreatment OutcomeCapecitabineOxaliplatinLARCNeoadjuvant radiotherapyRectal cancerSCRTSequential chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37702850
OpenAlexW4386704607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.