ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in intermediate- and high-risk neuroblastoma of the Children's Oncology Group risk stratification.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating neuron-specific enolase and venous-phase enhanced computed tomography radiomics for improved survival prediction in high-risk neuroblastoma: a two-center study.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
- Identification and validation of a novel five-gene signature in high-risk MYCN-not-amplified neuroblastoma.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting sever cancer-related fatigue in patients with cervical cancer.BMC cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and validate a nomogram for predicting survival in intermediate- and high-risk neuroblastoma patients and to compare the accuracy of the nomogram in predicting survival with Children's Oncology Group (COG) risk stratification.
methodsA total of 885 intermediate- and high-risk neuroblastoma patients were enrolled in this study, including 243 patients from our hospital (the training set) and 642 patients from the TARGET database (the validation set). The factors related to event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in neuroblastoma were determined to construct the nomogram by Cox regression analysis. The C-index, calibration curves, and area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to assess the predictive performance of the nomogram.
resultsInternational Neuroblastoma Staging System stage and Mitosis-karyorrhexis index (MKI) were significant unfavorable factors for EFS, while MKI and MYCN status were significant unfavorable factors for OS. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.621 and 0.586 for predicting EFS, 0.650 and 0.570 for predicting OS in the training and validation sets, respectively. The calibration curves revealed good agreement in the EFS and OS predicted by the nomogram. The AUCs of the nomogram for 1-, 2-, 3-year EFS and OS were 0.633, 0.669, 0.604 and 0.672, 0.670, 0.702 in the training set, respectively. Moreover, the nomogram was able to classify patients into two groups according to risk scores, with the "high-risk" group having a lower survival rate than the "intermediate-risk" group. And the nomogram performed better than the COG risk stratification, which had a C-index of 0.537, 0.502 and 0.565, 0.572 for predicting EFS, OS in the training and validation sets, respectively.
conclusionWe developed and validated a prognostic nomogram for intermediate- and high-risk neuroblastoma patients that clinicians can use to make more informed decisions for individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.