Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37702779›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Procedure after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation-Cooling or no more cooling?]

Kevin Roedl, Sebastian Wolfrum, Stefan Kluge

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin RoedlKlinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. k.roedl@uke.de.
Sebastian WolfrumInterdisziplinäre Notaufnahme, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Stefan KlugeKlinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 84 out of 100,000 inhabitants in Europe suffer from an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) each year. The mortality after cardiac arrest (CA) is high and is particularly determined by the predominant cardiogenic shock condition and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. For almost two decades hypothermic temperature control was the only neuroprotective intervention recommended in guidelines for postresuscitation care; however, recently published studies failed to demonstrate any improvement in the neurological outcome with hypothermia in comparison to strict normothermia in postresuscitation treatment. According to the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) guidelines published in 2022, unconscious adults after CA should be treated with temperature management and avoidance of fever; however, many questions remain open regarding the optimal target temperature, the cooling methods and the optimal duration. Despite these currently unanswered questions, a structured and high-quality postresuscitation care that includes a targeted temperature management should continue to be provided for all patients in the postresuscitation phase, independent of the selected target temperature. Furthermore, fever avoidance remains an important component of postresuscitation care.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationHypothermiaHypothermia, InducedOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAdultCold TemperatureFeverHumansFever preventionHeart arrestHypothermia, inducedPostresuscitation careTargeted temperature management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.