Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37702572›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2024

Astrocytes in functional recovery following central nervous system injuries.

Qasim M Alhadidi, Ghaith A Bahader, Oiva Arvola, Philip Kitchen, Zahoor A Shah, Mootaz M Salman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Repair Manual of a Fruit Fly Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Targeting the cGAS-STING pathway mitigates Huntington disease pathogenesis in a knock-in mouse model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Adenosine AJournal of neurochemistry · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Qasim M AlhadidiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ghaith A BahaderDepartment of Medicinal and Biological Chemistry, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Oiva ArvolaDivision of Anaesthesiology, Jorvi Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Philip KitchenCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Zahoor A ShahDepartment of Medicinal and Biological Chemistry, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8977-1618
Mootaz M SalmanDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5683-1706
University of Toledo · USAl Yarmouk University College · IQAston University · GBUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Discovery fellowship from the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W00934X/1Medical Research Council MR/W027119/1Medical Research Council (MRC) Career Development Award MR/W027119/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes are increasingly recognised as partaking in complex homeostatic mechanisms critical for regulating neuronal plasticity following central nervous system (CNS) insults. Ischaemic stroke and traumatic brain injury are associated with high rates of disability and mortality. Depending on the context and type of injury, reactive astrocytes respond with diverse morphological, proliferative and functional changes collectively known as astrogliosis, which results in both pathogenic and protective effects. There is a large body of research on the negative consequences of astrogliosis following brain injuries. There is also growing interest in how astrogliosis might in some contexts be protective and help to limit the spread of the injury. However, little is known about how astrocytes contribute to the chronic functional recovery phase following traumatic and ischaemic brain insults. In this review, we explore the protective functions of astrocytes in various aspects of secondary brain injury such as oedema, inflammation and blood-brain barrier dysfunction. We also discuss the current knowledge on astrocyte contribution to tissue regeneration, including angiogenesis, neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, dendrogenesis and axogenesis. Finally, we discuss diverse astrocyte-related factors that, if selectively targeted, could form the basis of astrocyte-targeted therapeutic strategies to better address currently untreatable CNS disorders.

Indexed as

AstrocytesRecovery of FunctionAnimalsGliosisHumansastrocytesbrain injuryfunctional recoveryregenerationtraumatic CNS injury

Identifiers

PMID37702572
PMCPMC11421637
OpenAlexW4386704181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.