Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37702431›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2023

Dialect and gender perception in relation to the intelligibility of low-pass and high-pass filtered spontaneous speecha).

Ewa Jacewicz, Robert A Fox, Christopher E Holt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ewa JacewiczDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, 1070 Carmack Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Robert A FoxDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, 1070 Carmack Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Christopher E HoltDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, 1070 Carmack Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9102-8767

Funding

Cross-generational sound change in American EnglishR01DC006871 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACEWICZ, EWA · 2005 to 2009
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cues to speech intelligibility are within a narrow frequency range, with its upper limit not exceeding 4 kHz. It is still unclear whether speaker-related (indexical) information is available past this limit or how speaker characteristics are distributed at frequencies within and outside the intelligibility range. Using low-pass and high-pass filtering, we examined the perceptual salience of dialect and gender cues in both intelligible and unintelligible speech. Setting the upper frequency limit at 11 kHz, spontaneously produced unique utterances (n = 400) from 40 speakers were high-pass filtered with frequency cutoffs from 0.7 to 5.56 kHz and presented to listeners for dialect and gender identification and intelligibility evaluation. The same material and experimental procedures were used to probe perception of low-pass filtered and unmodified speech with cutoffs from 0.5 to 1.1 kHz. Applying statistical signal detection theory analyses, we found that cues to gender were well preserved at low and high frequencies and did not depend on intelligibility, and the redundancy of gender cues at higher frequencies reduced response bias. Cues to dialect were relatively strong at low and high frequencies; however, most were in intelligible speech, modulated by a differential intelligibility advantage of male and female speakers at low and high frequencies.

Indexed as

CognitionSpeech IntelligibilityCuesFemaleHumansLanguageMalePerception

Identifiers

PMID37702431
PMCPMC10501805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.