ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2024
Multisite MRI Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Repeatability and Reproducibility across 3 T Scanners in a Breast Diffusion Phantom: A BReast Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Multisite (BRIMM) Study.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI Using Perfused Explanted Human Livers.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Integrating time-dependent diffusion MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion for predicting NPI and molecular subtypes in breast cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Motion and Flow Robust Free-Breathing Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging of the Kidney.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- From Research to Routine: The Emerging Role of DWI Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Metrics in Breast MRI.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
- Evaluating Breast Cancer Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI Biomarkers across Software Platforms.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
- Advanced breast diffusion-weighted imaging: what are the next steps? A proposal from the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-weighted Imaging working group.European radiology · 2025Review
- Quantitative MR Imaging of the Breast.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Review
- Retrospective BReast Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Multisite (BRIMM) multisoftware study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Phantoms for Quantitative Body MRI: a review and discussion of the phantom value.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMonoexponential apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and biexponential intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging is helpful in the characterization of breast tumors. However, repeatability/reproducibility studies across scanners and across sites are scarce. PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of ADC and IVIM parameters (tissue diffusivity (D STUDY TYPE: Phantom repeatability. PHANTOM: A breast phantom containing tubes of different polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) concentrations, water, fat, and sponge flow chambers, together with an MR-compatible liquid crystal (LC) thermometer. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Bipolar gradient twice-refocused spin echo sequence and monopolar gradient single spin echo sequence at 3 T. ASSESSMENT: Studies were performed twice in each of two scanners, located at different sites, on each of 2 days, resulting in four studies per scanner. ADCs of the PVP and water were normalized to the vendor-provided calibrated values at the temperature indicated by the LC thermometer for repeatability/reproducibility comparisons. STATISTICAL TESTS: ADC and IVIM repeatability and reproducibility within and across sites were estimated via the within-system coefficient of variation (wCV). Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was also computed between IVIM metrics and flow speed. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsADC and D DATA
conclusionIVIM reproducibility results were promising and similar to ADC, particularly for D LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.