Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37702366›Full record

ArticleProtein engineering, design & selection : PEDS2023

An easy-to-use high-throughput selection system for the discovery of recombinant protein binders from alternative scaffold libraries.

Marit Möller, Malin Jönsson, Magnus Lundqvist, Blenda Hedin, Louise Larsson, Emma Larsson, Johan Rockberg, Mathias Uhlén, Sarah Lindbo, Hanna Tegel and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Construction of Naïve and Immune Human Fab Phage Display Library.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Engineered calcium-regulated affinity protein for efficient internalization and lysosomal toxin delivery.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marit MöllerDepartment of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden.
Malin JönssonDepartment of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden.
Magnus LundqvistDepartment of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden.
Blenda HedinDepartment of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden.
Louise LarssonDepartment of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden.
Emma LarssonDepartment of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden.
Johan RockbergDepartment of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden.
Mathias UhlénDepartment of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden.
Sarah LindboDepartment of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden.
Hanna TegelDepartment of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden.
Sophia HoberDepartment of Protein Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden.
KTH Royal Institute of Technology · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection by phage display is a popular and widely used technique for the discovery of recombinant protein binders from large protein libraries for therapeutic use. The protein library is displayed on the surface of bacteriophages which are amplified using bacteria, preferably Escherichia coli, to enrich binders in several selection rounds. Traditionally, the so-called panning procedure during which the phages are incubated with the target protein, washed and eluted is done manually, limiting the throughput. High-throughput systems with automated panning already in use often require high-priced equipment. Moreover, the bottleneck of the selection process is usually the screening and characterization. Therefore, having a high-throughput panning procedure without a scaled screening platform does not necessarily increase the discovery rate. Here, we present an easy-to-use high-throughput selection system with automated panning using cost-efficient equipment integrated into a workflow with high-throughput sequencing and a tailored screening step using biolayer-interferometry. The workflow has been developed for selections using two recombinant libraries, ADAPT (Albumin-binding domain-derived affinity proteins) and CaRA (Calcium-regulated affinity) and has been evaluated for three new targets. The newly established semi-automated system drastically reduced the hands-on time and increased robustness while the selection outcome, when compared to manual handling, was very similar in deep sequencing analysis and generated binders in the nanomolar affinity range. The developed selection system has shown to be highly versatile and has the potential to be applied to other binding domains for the discovery of new protein binders.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesPeptide LibraryCell Surface Display TechniquesEscherichia coliRecombinant ProteinsPeptide LibraryRecombinant Proteinsalternative scaffold proteinsautomated phage displayhigh-throughput selectionhigh-throughput sequencingsynthetic binder libraries

Identifiers

PMID37702366
PMCPMC10545973
OpenAlexW4386643344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.