ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2024
Effects of T
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Proximal Bone Shape Asymmetry Analysis and Clinical Correlation with Cartilage Relaxation Times and Functional Activity.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional high-isotropic-resolution MR fingerprinting optimized for 0.55 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Association of cartilageOsteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe polyarticular nature of Osteoarthritis (OA) tends to manifest in multi-joints. Associations between cartilage health in connected joints can help identify early degeneration and offer the potential for biomechanical intervention. Such associations between hip and knee cartilages remain understudied. PURPOSE: To investigate T STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight subjects (age 55.1 ± 12.8 years, 15 females) with none-to-moderate hip-OA while no radiographic knee-OA. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, bilateral hip, and knee: 3D-proton-density-fat-saturated (PDFS) Cube and Magnetization-Prepared-Angle-Modulated-Partitioned-k-Space-Spoiled-Gradient-Echo-Snapshots (MAPSS). ASSESSMENT: Ages of subjects were categorized into Group-1 (≤40), Group-2 (41-50), Group-3 (51-60), Group-4 (61-70), Group-5 (71-80), and Group-6 (≥81). Hip T STATISTICAL TESTS: For Intra-and-Inter-limb, 5 optimum predictors out of 13 (Hip subregional T
resultsLME-model DATA
conclusionSignificant positive and negative T EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.