ArticleCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening2024
Investigating the Precise Identification of Citrullination Sites with High- Performance Score Metrics Using a Powerful Computation Predicting Tool.
Article in Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo elucidate the detailed mechanisms of citrullination at the molecular level and design drugs applicable to major human diseases, predicting protein citrullination sites (PCSs) is essential. Using experimental approaches to predict PCSs is time-consuming and costly. However, there is a limited scope of the current PCS predictors. In particular, most predictors are commonly used for PCS prediction and have limited performance scores.
objectiveThis work aims to provide an improved sophisticated predictor of citrullination sites using a benchmark dataset in a machine learning platform.
methodsThis study presents a reliable citrullination site predictor based on a benchmark dataset containing a 1:1 ratio of positive and negative samples. We classified citrullination sites using the Composition of the K-Spaced Amino Acid Pairs (CKSAAP) and Support Vector Machine (SVM).
resultsWe developed PCS predictors using integrated machine-learning methods that produced the highest average scores. Using 10-fold cross-validation on test datasets, the True Positive Rate (TPR) was 98.34%, the True Negative Rate (TNR) was 99.44%, the accuracy was 98.89%, the Mathew Correlation Coefficient (MCC) was 98.21%, the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) was 0.999, and the partial Area Under the ROC Curve (pAUC) was 0.1968.
conclusionAccording to overall performance, our developed predictor has a significantly higher implementation in comparison with the current tools on the same benchmark dataset. Moreover, it showed better performance metrics on both test and training datasets. Our developed predictor is promising and can be implemented as a complementary technique for identifying fast and precise citrullination sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37702240What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.