ReviewCurrent drug research reviews2024
Metabolomics: A Tool to Envisage Biomarkers in Clinical Interpretation of Cancer.
Review in Current drug research reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer is amongst the most dreadful ailments of modern times, and its impact continuously worsens global health systems. Early diagnosis and suitable therapeutic agents are the prime keys to managing this disease. Metabolomics deals with the complete profiling of cells and physiological phenomena in their organelles, thus helping in keen knowledge of the pathological status of the disease. It has been proven to be one of the best strategies in the early screening of cancer.
objectiveThis review has covered the recent updates on the promising role of metabolomics in the identification of significant biochemical markers in cancer-prone individuals that could lead to the identification of cancer in the early stages.
methodsThe literature was collected through various databases, like Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar, with stress laid on the last ten years' publications.
conclusionIt was assessed in this review that early recognition of cancerous growth could be achieved via complete metabolic profiling in association with transcriptomics and proteomics. The outcomes are rooted in various clinical studies that anticipated various biomarkers like tryptophan, phenylalanine, lactates, and different metabolic pathways associated with the Warburg effect. This metabolite imaging has been a fundamental step for the target acquisition, evaluation of predictive cancer biomarkers for early detection, and outlooks into cancer therapy along with critical evaluation. Significant efforts should be made to make this technique most reliable and easy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.