Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37702040›Full record

ArticleDisability and rehabilitation2024

Development of an ontology to characterize mental functioning.

Maryanne J Sacco, Guy Divita, Elizabeth Rasch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maryanne J SaccoRehabilitation Medicine Department, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Guy DivitaRehabilitation Medicine Department, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Elizabeth RaschRehabilitation Medicine Department, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the articleThis article describes a conceptual and methodological approach to integrating functional information into an ontology to categorize mental functioning, which to date is an under-developed area of classification, and supports our work with the United States (U.S.) Social Security Administration (SSA). DESIGN AND METHODOLOGICAL PROCEDURES: Conceptualizing and defining mental functioning was paramount to develop natural language processing (NLP) tools to support our use case. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) was the framework used to conceptualize mental functioning at the activities and participation level in clinical records. To address challenges that arose when applying the ICF as to what should or should not be classified as mental functioning, a mental functioning domain ontology was developed that rearranged, reclassified and incorporated all ICF key components, concepts, classifications, and their definitions.

conclusionsChallenges emerged in the extent to which we could directly align components in the ICF into an applied ontology of mental functioning. These conceptual challenges required rearrangement of ICF components to adequately support our use case within the social security disability determination process. Findings also have implications to support future NLP efforts for behavioral health outcomes and policy research.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthNatural Language ProcessingPersons with DisabilitiesHumansUnited StatesUnited States Social Security Administrationclinical informaticsinternational classification of functioning, disability and healthmental functioningmental healthontology

Identifiers

PMID37702040
PMCPMC10932805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.