ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023
Sound processing in the cricket brain: evidence for a pulse duration filter.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Co-Expressed Cluster of Genes in the Anterior Brain of Female Crickets Activated by a Species-Specific Calling Song.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The auditory system of female crickets allows them to specifically recognize and approach the species-specific male calling song, defined by sound pulses and silent intervals. Auditory brain neurons form a delay-line and coincidence detector network tuned to the pulse period of the male song. We analyzed the impact of changes in pulse duration on the behavior and the responses of the auditory neurons and the network. We confirm that the ascending neuron AN1 and the local neuron LN2 copy the temporal structure of the song. During ongoing long sound pulses, the delay-line neuron LN5 shows additional rebound responses and the coincidence detector neuron LN3 can generate additional bursts of activity, indicating that these may be driven by intrinsic oscillations of the network. Moreover, the response of the feature detector neuron LN4 is shaped by a combination of inhibitory and excitatory synaptic inputs, and LN4 responds even to long sound pulses with a short depolarization and burst of spikes, like to a sound pulse of natural duration. This response property of LN4 indicates a selective auditory pulse duration filter mechanism of the pattern recognition network, which is tuned to the duration of natural pulses. Comparing the tuning of the phonotactic behavior with the tuning of the local auditory brain neurons to the same test patterns, we find no evidence that a modulation of the phonotactic behavior is reflected at the level of the feature detector neurons. This rather suggests that steering to nonattractive pulse patterns is organized at the thoracic level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.