Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37701786›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2023

The interaction between random and systematic visual stimulation and infraslow quasiperiodic spatiotemporal patterns of whole brain activity.

Nan Xu, Derek M Smith, George Jeno, Dolly T Seeburger, Eric H Schumacher, Shella D Keilholz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nan XuWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Derek M SmithSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
George JenoSchool of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Dolly T SeeburgerSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Eric H SchumacherSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Shella D KeilholzWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USJohns Hopkins University · USThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · US

Funding

Contribution of Ultra Low Frequency LFPs to Functional MRIR01NS078095 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KEILHOLZ, SHELLA D · 2012 to 2022
$3.4M
Time-varying spatiotemporal causal interactions in the functional brain networksK99NS123113 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI XU, NAN · 2023 to 2024
$184k
NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS123113NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One prominent feature of the infraslow BOLD signal during rest or task is quasi-periodic spatiotemporal pattern (QPP) of signal changes that involves an alternation of activity in key functional networks and propagation of activity across brain areas, and that is known to tie to the infraslow neural activity involved in attention and arousal fluctuations. This ongoing whole-brain pattern of activity might potentially modify the response to incoming stimuli or be modified itself by the induced neural activity. To investigate this, we presented checkerboard sequences flashing at 6Hz to subjects. This is a salient visual stimulus that is known to produce a strong response in visual processing regions. Two different visual stimulation sequences were employed, a systematic stimulation sequence in which the visual stimulus appeared every 20.3 secs and a random stimulation sequence in which the visual stimulus occurred randomly every 14~62.3 secs. Three central observations emerged. First, the two different stimulation conditions affect the QPP waveform in different aspects, i.e., systematic stimulation has greater effects on its phase and random stimulation has greater effects on its magnitude. Second, the QPP was more frequent in the systematic condition with significantly shorter intervals between consecutive QPPs compared to the random condition. Third, the BOLD signal response to the visual stimulus across both conditions was swamped by the QPP at the stimulus onset. These results provide novel insights into the relationship between intrinsic patterns and stimulated brain activity.

Identifiers

PMID37701786
PMCPMC10494556
OpenAlexW4384916241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.