Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37701768›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2023

A survey of paediatric difficult peripheral intravenous access in the emergency department and use of point-of-care ultrasound.

Clayton Lam, Lucy Dunstan, Amy Sweeny, Stuart Watkins, Shane George, Peter J Snelling

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07013994 (Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Guided Techniques for Vascular Access in Patients With Difficult Venous Access in Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07013994 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Traditional and Ultrasound-Guided Techniques for Vascular Access in Patients With Difficult Venous Access in Emergency Department: Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorMercedes Segunda Peralta GámezRan2025 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsArterial Blood Pressure, Difficult Vein AccessArmsperipheral venous cannulation with ultrasound-guided technique, Arterial gas puncture using ultrasound-guided technique, Peripheral venous cannulation with traditional technique, Arterial puncture by traditional technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clayton LamDepartment of Emergency Medicine Gold Coast University Hospital Southport Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4668-7907
Lucy DunstanDepartment of Emergency Medicine Gold Coast University Hospital Southport Queensland Australia.
Amy SweenyDepartment of Emergency Medicine Gold Coast University Hospital Southport Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8392-5612
Stuart WatkinsDepartment of Emergency Medicine Gold Coast University Hospital Southport Queensland Australia.
Shane GeorgeDepartment of Emergency Medicine Gold Coast University Hospital Southport Queensland Australia.
Peter J SnellingDepartment of Emergency Medicine Gold Coast University Hospital Southport Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8579-445X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose: Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion can be challenging in children, with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) known to increase success rates. The objective of this study was to survey how emergency department (ED) clinicians identify and escalate paediatric patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA), specifically the use of POCUS. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in an Australian academic mixed ED that surveyed resident medical officers (RMOs), registrars, consultants and senior paediatric nurses. A 15 multiple-choice questionnaire evaluated clinicians experience with paediatric PIVC insertion, approach to identifying and managing DIVA and the use of POCUS or other adjuncts. Results: Eighty clinicians (34.2% response rate) completed the survey. Poor vein palpability was rated the highest predictor of DIVA. Of the respondents, 19 consultants (86.4%), 28 registrars (90.3%) and 16 RMOs (64.0%) used POCUS as an adjunct for paediatric DIVA patients but 16 consultants (72.8%), 21 registrars (67.8%) and 20 RMOs (80.0%) would use this less than 25% of the time in clinical practice. Discussion: This survey suggests more clinicians to prefer using objective factors when identifying paediatric DIVA patients, rather than subjectively using gestalt, which relies on clinician experience. Whilst clearly recognised as a useful tool in our study, POCUS was used infrequently for paediatric DIVA patients. Conclusions: There is currently no consistent process for the identification and escalation of paediatric DIVA patients, including the use of adjuncts such as POCUS. Clinician awareness for these issues should be addressed, which should include the development of guidelines and clinician training in POCUS for PIVC insertion in children.

Indexed as

difficult intravenous accesseducationemergency medicinepaediatricperipheral intravenous catheterpoint‐of‐care ultrasoundultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID37701768
PMCPMC10493356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.