ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2023
Estimating effective reproduction number revisited.
Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel approach to extract epidemiological information from waves in epidemic's profiles.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2026Article
- Modeling and Characterizing the Growth of the Texas-New Mexico Measles Outbreak of 2025.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mathematical models to characterize the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in New Mexico, USA.Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE · 2025Article
- Risk Factors and Long-Term Outcomes in Horses After the 2021 Outbreak of Equine Herpesvirus 1 Myeloencephalopathy, Valencia, Spain.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately estimating the effective reproduction number is crucial for characterizing the transmissibility of infectious diseases to optimize interventions and responses during epidemic outbreaks. In this study, we improve the estimation of the effective reproduction number through two main approaches. First, we derive a discrete model to represent a time series of case counts and propose an estimation method based on this framework. We also conduct numerical experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed discretization scheme. By doing so, we enhance the accuracy of approximating the underlying epidemic process compared to previous methods, even when the counting period is similar to the mean generation time of an infectious disease. Second, we employ a negative binomial distribution to model the variability of count data to accommodate overdispersion. Specifically, given that observed incidence counts follow a negative binomial distribution, the posterior distribution of secondary infections is obtained as a Dirichlet multinomial distribution. With this formulation, we establish posterior uncertainty bounds for the effective reproduction number. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method using incidence data from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.