Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37701756›Full record

ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2023

Estimating effective reproduction number revisited.

Shinsuke Koyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shinsuke KoyamaDepartment of Statistical Modeling, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 10-3 Midori-cho, Tachikawa, 190-8562, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately estimating the effective reproduction number is crucial for characterizing the transmissibility of infectious diseases to optimize interventions and responses during epidemic outbreaks. In this study, we improve the estimation of the effective reproduction number through two main approaches. First, we derive a discrete model to represent a time series of case counts and propose an estimation method based on this framework. We also conduct numerical experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed discretization scheme. By doing so, we enhance the accuracy of approximating the underlying epidemic process compared to previous methods, even when the counting period is similar to the mean generation time of an infectious disease. Second, we employ a negative binomial distribution to model the variability of count data to accommodate overdispersion. Specifically, given that observed incidence counts follow a negative binomial distribution, the posterior distribution of secondary infections is obtained as a Dirichlet multinomial distribution. With this formulation, we establish posterior uncertainty bounds for the effective reproduction number. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method using incidence data from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Effective reproduction numberEpidemic modelOverdispersion

Identifiers

PMID37701756
PMCPMC10493262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.