Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37701687›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2023

Is endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting superior to conventional methods for removing sessile colorectal polyps?

Qun-Ying Yang, Qian Zhao, Jian-Wen Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qun-Ying YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang 322100, Zhejiang Province, China.
Qian ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang 322100, Zhejiang Province, China.
Jian-Wen HuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang 322100, Zhejiang Province, China. cchcsq0529@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We reviewed a study that reported a comparative analysis of the effects of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) precutting and conventional EMR for removing non-pedunculated, 10-20 mm sized colorectal polyps. We identified some statistical deficiencies in this study. In addition, we believe that the differences between the treatments failed to achieve significance, and therefore, further analysis is required.

Indexed as

Colorectal polypsComparative analysisEndoscopic mucosal resectionEndoscopic mucosal resection precutting

Identifiers

PMID37701687
PMCPMC10494592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.