Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37701676›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2023

DPSP: a multimodal deep learning framework for polypharmacy side effects prediction.

Raziyeh Masumshah, Changiz Eslahchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raziyeh MasumshahDepartment of Computer and Data Sciences, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran 1983969411, Iran.
Changiz EslahchiDepartment of Computer and Data Sciences, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran 1983969411, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8913-3904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Because unanticipated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can result in severe bodily harm, identifying the adverse effects of polypharmacy is one of the most important tasks in human health. Over the past few decades, computational methods for predicting the adverse effects of polypharmacy have been developed. Results: This article presents DPSP, a framework for predicting polypharmacy side effects based on the construction of novel drug features and the application of a deep neural network to predict DDIs. In the first step, a variety of drug information is evaluated, and a feature extraction method and the Jaccard similarity are used to determine similarities between two drugs. By combining these similarities, a novel feature vector is generated for each drug. In the second step, the method predicts DDIs for specific DDI events using a multimodal framework and drug feature vectors. On three benchmark datasets, the performance of DPSP is measured by comparing its results to those of several well-known methods, such as GNN-DDI, MSTE, MDF-SA-DDI, NNPS, DDIMDL, DNN, DeepDDI, KNN, LR, and RF. DPSP outperforms these classification methods based on a variety of classification metrics. The results indicate that the use of diverse drug information is effective and efficient for identifying DDI adverse effects. Availability and implementation: The source code and datasets are available at https://github.com/raziyehmasumshah/DPSP.

Identifiers

PMID37701676
PMCPMC10493180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.