ArticleMediastinum (Hong Kong, China)2023
Robotic resection of anterior mediastinal masses >10 cm: a case series.
Article in Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perspectives on surgical treatment for thymic epithelial tumors: a narrative review.Gland surgery · 2024Review
- Redefining dogma and repealing of false rules-finding the true limits of medicine and surgery.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2023Article
- Size should not be an absolute contraindication: the case for robotic resection of ever larger anterior mediastinal masses.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2023Article
- Robotic resection of large anterior mediastinal masses.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for intrathoracic pathology and especially for mediastinal mass resection has been increasingly accepted as an alternative method to open sternotomy and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). However, the utilization of this approach for complex and advanced in size cases needs more clinical evidence. We are presenting a series of 4 patients who had resection of >10 cm mediastinal masses via RATS. Cases Description: The mean age was 76.25±10.3 years and 3 were males (75%). All masses were positron emission tomography (PET) positive, and 1 patient had positive Acetyl-cholinesterase antibodies and myasthenia gravis (MG). All patients underwent RATS resection via DaVinci Conclusions: This report shows that RATS is safe and can be offered in the management of >10 cm anterior mediastinal masses. The previous size limit of the tumor for minimally invasive and especially RATS approach of 5 cm should be challenged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.