ReviewLe infezioni in medicina2023
The sources of antimicrobial peptides against Gram-positives and Gramnegatives: our research experience.
Review in Le infezioni in medicina, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The ethnicity and gut microbiota hypothesis: analyzing multifactorial interactions and their health implications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- The Recombinant Production of Novel Bovine Lactoferricin Engineered Peptide Using Molecular Dynamics Simulation.Archives of Razi Institute · 2025Article
- Snake Venom Compounds: A New Frontier in the Battle Against Antibiotic-Resistant Infections.Toxins · 2025Review
- Frog Skin Peptides Hylin-a1, AR-23, and RV-23: Promising Tools Against Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance of Gram-positive and Gramnegative bacteria is becoming increasingly prevalent. For this reason, the search for new molecules that can overcome current resistance and also recover antibiotics that are no longer effective is becoming increasingly urgent. Our research group at the 'Polytechnic University of Marche' managed to study the effectiveness of certain antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). We decided to review our experience with AMPs by classifying them according to their origin and evaluating their effect on Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. AMPs can derive from mammals, amphibians, microorganisms, and insects. In conclusion, our research experience shows that the richest source of AMPs are amphibians. However, the studies done are mainly in vitro or in animal models, requiring further human studies to assess the efficacy and safety of these molecules. AMPs may be a new therapeutic option for infections sustained by multi-resistant micro-organisms and for overcoming the mechanisms of resistance to antibiotics currently used. In particular, combining AMPs with antibiotics, including those with limited antimicrobial activity due to antimicrobial resistance, has often shown a synergistic effect, increasing or restoring their efficacy. The possibility of using manageable and relatively safe antibiotics again is crucial, considering the widespread increase in bacterial resistance in hospitals and the community. Despite a plethora of research on AMPs and their application as potential treatment on infectious diseases, this area needs further exploration. There is evidence that the characteristics of AMPs can seriously improve through structural chemical modifications and different delivery systems to become alternatives drugs to conventional antibiotics. The aim is to provide an overview of the possible sources from which AMPs are extracted, evaluating their action exclusively on Gram-positive and negative bacteria. This is to determine, based on our experience, which might be the most promising sources of AMPs for future research as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.