Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37701355›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2023

Evaluating the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare workers regarding high-risk nosocomial infections: A global cross-sectional study.

Elham M Khatrawi, Priyadarshi Prajjwal, Muhammad Farhan, Pugazhendi Inban, Shraddha Gurha, Saud M S Al-Ezzi, Mohammed D M Marsool, Prerna Ahuja, Mohammed A Mateen, Felix O Aina and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elham M KhatrawiMedical Microbiology and Immunology Department Taibah University Medina Saudi Arabia.
Priyadarshi PrajjwalInternal Medicine Bharati Vidyapeeth University Medical College Pune India.ORCID 0000-0001-7894-1829
Muhammad FarhanInternal Medicine Ajman University Ajman UAE.
Pugazhendi InbanInternal Medicine, Government Medical College, Omandurar Chennai Tamil Nadu India.ORCID 0000-0001-7569-3743
Shraddha GurhaDepartment of Public Health, School of Public Health Poornima University Jaipur India.ORCID 0000-0002-0367-1171
Saud M S Al-EzziInternal Medicine Lugansk State Medical University Lugansk Ukraine.
Mohammed D M MarsoolAl-kindy College of Medicine/University of Baghdad Baghdad Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3481-4534
Prerna AhujaInternal Medicine Teerthankar Mahaveer University Moradabad India.
Mohammed A MateenShadan Institute of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital and Research Centre Hyderabad India.ORCID 0000-0002-1416-2727
Felix O AinaFamily Medicine, College of Medicine Ekiti State University Ado Ekiti Nigeria.
Omniat A HussinMicrobiology, Al Manhal Academy Khartoum Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5021-263X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) play a vital role in delivering care and are frequently exposed to the risk of acquiring infections within the hospital setting. Around 15% of hospitalized patients suffer from these infections globally. However, the role and awareness of HCWs in the transmission of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) or nosocomial infections is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) toward high-risk microbial infections among HCWs on a global scale to identify measures to address this problem. Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted between 2022 and 2023, with HCWs selected as the study population. Data concerning KAP were collected through a self-administered online survey questionnaire, using a nonprobability convenience sampling method. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used to analyze the data. Results: A total of 743 HCWs from various countries participated in the study, with the majority of respondents being doctors (64.9%). Data were mainly obtained from Saudi Arabia (26.78%), Iraq (25.84%), India (15.7%), the United States of America (15.2%), and Africa (Sudan, Nigeria) (13.98%). The frequency of good KAP scores among physicians (KAP: 82.5, 80.66, and 70.5), nurses (KAP: 74.1, 73.07, and 88.7), medical practitioners (KAP: 87.2, 77.58, and 75.1), and technicians (KAP: 76.1, 74.38, and 89.6) were obtained as mentioned. With respect to experience, HCWs showed good KAP scores in 1-5 years (KAP: 82.4, 83.3, and 74.1), 5-10 years (KAP: 80.6, 74.54, 83), 10-20 years (KAP: 74.7, 79.1, and 82.7), and >20 years (KAP: 84.6, 78.8, and 82.8) categories. Conclusion: This study suggests that HCWs have good KAP regarding infection prevention, but there is still room for improvement. Educational seminars and awareness programs can provide better adherence to barrier protection measures such as hand washing, use of gloves, and hand disinfection.

Indexed as

attitudehealthcare workersknowledgenosocomial infectionspractice

Identifiers

PMID37701355
PMCPMC10494663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.