ArticleMateria socio-medica2023
Satisfaction and Experience of Women with Breast Cancer Screening Services in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Materia socio-medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Satisfaction of women with breast cancer screening programs is important to ensure the program effectiveness. Objective: To assess the experience and satisfaction of women with breast cancer screening services. Methods: This was a descriptive study targeting 312 women undergoing mammography screening in Riyadh Region in Saudi Arabia. The data were collected through telephone interviews using a structured questionnaire covering eight domains. Weighted means were calculated by dividing the average scores for each item and domain by their maximum scores. Multiple regression was performed to identify the factors related to general satisfaction. Results: Overall satisfaction weighted mean was 0.879. Experiences were best for physical surroundings and perceived competency of staff domains with weighted means of 0.929 and 0.914 respectively. Accessibility and waiting time, and staff interpersonal skills domains came next with weighted means of 0.901 and 0.876 respectively. Information transfer, physical discomfort and psychological discomfort domains came last with weighted means of 0.783, 0.736 and 0.673 respectively. General satisfaction was related to waiting time and access domain (Exp(B) =.709 (95% CI: .595-.843, p value: .000), staff interpersonal skills domain (Exp(B) = .815 (95% CI: .686- .968, p value: .020) and perceived competency of the staff domain (Exp(B) = .660 (95% CI: .458- .951, p value: .026). Conclusions: Overall satisfaction with breast cancer screening was high and the experience of women was highly positive for most of the domains. More efforts are needed to improve the information transfer by addressing the language barriers and to enhance the physical and psychological experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.