Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37701295›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2023

Quantitative assessment of inframammary fold in Asians: an MRI study.

Dawei Wang, Yi Yi, Yuping Ren, Yiping Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dawei Wang *Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yi Yi *Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yuping RenDepartment of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yiping WuDepartment of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The inframammary fold (IMF) is a critical structure affecting the aesthetics of the breast, yet the anatomy and location of the IMF remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the thickness and location of IMF utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: The MRI images of 240 breasts from 120 Asian women were analyzed. The quantitative measurements consisted of breast width, breast projection, nipple to inframammary fold, breast volume, IMF tissue thickness, and IMF position. The IMF position was evaluated by referring to the ribs, as well as measuring the distance between IMF and the inferior of the fifth rib. Results: The mean values of central thickness, medial thickness, and lateral thickness were 1.50±0.59, 1.46±0.60, and 1.76±1.04 cm, respectively. IMF central thickness demonstrated a moderate positive correlation with breast projection (r=0.559, P<0.001) and breast volume (r=0.523, P<0.001). The proportions of IMF located at the fourth intercostal, the fifth rib, the fifth intercostal, the sixth rib and the sixth intercostal were 5.8%, 29.2%, 43.3%, 20.4% and 1.3%, respectively. The average distance between IMF and the inferior of the fifth rib was 0.69±1.40 cm. 60.0% of women had near-symmetrical IMF, while 17.5% had left higher IMF and 22.5% had right higher IMF. Conclusions: This study used MRI to quantitatively assess the anatomy of IMF. The detailed knowledge of IMF would facilitate the ideal aesthetic outcome of mammaplasty.

Indexed as

anatomyInframammary fold (IMF)magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)mammaplasty

Identifiers

PMID37701295
PMCPMC10493628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.