ArticlePolish journal of radiology2023
Endovascular management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a tertiary-centre experience.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke related to cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is uncommon, with untoward lethal outcomes. Systemic anticoagulation is the treatment of choice. However, some patients can be resistant to this treatment. Endovascular management with thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy can be a viable option in such cases. Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the endovascular management used for CVT in 8 patients who failed to respond to standard anticoagulation therapy between December 2017 and December 2022 in our institute. Clinical profile, imaging parameters, endovascular procedure details, and outcomes in terms of angiographic findings and clinical follow-up were analysed. Results: In this period, a total of 8 patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy. The procedure was successful in all cases (8/8 = 100%), and 50% of them showed near total/complete recanalization; Perforation of the cortical veins was noted in 2 cases (~25%). Among the 8 patients, one died (1/8 = 12.5%) due to cardiac aetiology; the remaining 7 patients (87.5%) showed good clinical outcome with a modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2. Conclusion: Catheter-directed thrombolysis with mechanical thromboaspiration is a safe and effective treatment for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis not responding to anticoagulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.