Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37701166›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

MRI Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Lymph Node Staging Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.

Ingrida Pikūnienė, Žilvinas Saladžinskas, Algidas Basevičius, Vestina Strakšytė, Justas Žilinskas, Rita Ambrazienė

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ingrida PikūnienėDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Kaunas, LTU.
Žilvinas SaladžinskasDepartment of Surgery, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Kaunas, LTU.
Algidas BasevičiusDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Kaunas, LTU.
Vestina StrakšytėDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Kaunas, LTU.
Justas ŽilinskasDepartment of Surgery, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Kaunas, LTU.
Rita AmbrazienėDepartment of Oncology, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Kaunas, LTU.
Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Colorectal cancer is the third most diagnosed cancer globally. Lymph node metastases significantly affect prognosis, emphasizing the importance of early detection and management. Despite significant advances in conventional MRI's role in staging, improvements in advanced functional imaging such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in identifying lymph node metastases persist. Objectives The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) MRI in evaluating lymph node staging in rectal cancer. Patients and methods In a prospective study, 89 patients with stage II-III rectal cancer were grouped into two treatments: pre-operative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and standard pre-operative chemoradiotherapy. All underwent 1.5T MRI, with T2-weighted and DWI sequences. A radiologist defined regions of interest on the tumor, lymph nodes, and intact rectal wall to calculate ADC values. Results Rectal cancer ADC's receiver operating characteristic curve had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.688 (P < 0.001), with optimal ADC cutoff at 0.99 x 10-3 mm2/s (sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 83%). For lymph nodes, AUC was 0.508 (P < 0.001), with a cutoff of 0.9 x 10-3 mm2/s (sensitivity: 78%, specificity: 67%). No correlation between tumor and lymph node ADC values was observed. In chemotherapy patients, "healthy" inguinal lymph nodes had higher ADC values than affected ones pre-treatment (P = 0.001), a disparity fading post-treatment (P = 0.313). For chemoradiotherapy patients, the ADC difference persisted pre and post-treatment (P = 0.001). Conclusion The study of ADC-MRI showed different ADC values between tumors and lymph nodes and highlighted ADC differences between treatment groups. Notably, no correlation was observed between tumor and lymph node ADC values. However, differences were apparent when comparing "healthy" inguinal nodes with lymph nodes affected by cancer.

Indexed as

apparent diffusion coefficientdiffusion-weighted imaginglymph nodesmagnetic resonance imagingrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID37701166
PMCPMC10493462
OpenAlexW4386605948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.