ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2023
International experts consensus guidelines on robotic liver resection in 2023.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for benign liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic hepatectomy for benign liver disease: single-centre consecutive series and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive and open approaches.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Updated overview of robotic hepatic parenchymal transection techniques: technical developments, international perspectives, and future directions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Risk factors for morbidity in both donor and recipient following minimally invasive donor hepatectomy: a systematic review.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating robotic vs. laparoscopic liver resection for BCLC stage 0-I hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies on perioperative outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Specific Items of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Liver Surgery in Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review.World journal of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Comparing Open, Laparoscopic and Robotic Liver Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for benign disease: analysis of textbook outcomes according to difficulty of resections and role of the robotic approach.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Transitioning to the robotic era for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: initial implementation and outcomes in a single center.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Reduced-port robotic partial hepatectomy using a simultaneous colostomy-closure site via a glove-port: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted liver surgery: A comparison between patients with and without previous abdominal surgery.Surgery open science · 2026Article
- Feasibility and perioperative safety of robotic liver resection using the da Vinci SP system: early single-center case series.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Robotic versus open hepatectomy for IWATE expert-level liver resection: a risk-adjusted comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Implementation of a Robotic Liver Surgery Program in a Large Municipal Hospital: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Clinical, Economic, and Learning Curve Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Tracking Technological Change in Liver Surgery: Robotic Adoption and Case-Mix Evolution in the I Go MILS Registry.Cancers · 2026Article
- Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in hepatobiliary procedures: a scoping review.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic recipient liver transplantation worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 93 patients, from feasibility to early outcomes.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Surgical Outcomes of Sequential Robot-Assisted Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery in a Single Operating Room: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of a High-Volume Center in Japan (TAKUMI-6).Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Response to correspondence to "Pencil cleaning technique for robotic liver parenchymal transection: a step further to systematization beyond the microfracture-coagulation method".Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The robotic liver resection (RLR) has been increasingly applied in recent years and its benefits shown in some aspects owing to the technical advancement of robotic surgical system, however, controversies still exist. Based on the foundation of the previous consensus statement, this new consensus document aimed to update clinical recommendations and provide guidance to improve the outcomes of RLR clinical practice. The guideline steering group and guideline expert group were formed by 29 international experts of liver surgery and evidence-based medicine (EBM). Relevant literature was reviewed and analyzed by the evidence evaluation group. According to the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, the Guidance Principles of Development and Amendment of the Guidelines for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment in China 2022, a total of 14 recommendations were generated. Among them were 8 recommendations formulated by the GRADE method, and the remaining 6 recommendations were formulated based on literature review and experts' opinion due to insufficient EBM results. This international experts consensus guideline offered guidance for the safe and effective clinical practice and the research direction of RLR in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.