ArticleCureus2023
Our Experience of Deep Sclerectomy at a Tertiary Center in the United Kingdom Over 14 Years.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal OCT changes of the peripapillary RNFL after different glaucoma interventions - a comparative study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Mitomycin C in Deep Sclerectomy with the Esnoper Clip Implant: A Case Series Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Visual and surgical outcomes of MMC augmented combined non-penetrating deep sclerectomy and phacoemulsification in eyes with severe and end stage glaucoma.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Five-Year Outcomes of Deep Sclerectomy in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma Compared to Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy: Challenges, innovations, and current evidence.Oman journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Deep sclerectomy (DS) is a non-penetrating surgical procedure for glaucoma, reducing the resistance to aqueous outflow and lowering intraocular pressure while maintaining a physiological barrier between the anterior chamber and the sub-scleral space. This offers a lower complication profile than penetrating procedures, though with less intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the electronic record for all DS undertaken at our hospital (a tertiary care center) over 14 years, collecting data on demographics, diagnosis, IOP, visual acuity, complications, medications, and further procedures required. Results Eighty eyes of 69 patients underwent DS, with a mean follow-up period of 53.5 months. The mean pre-operative IOP was 23.55 mmHg (range 11-52, standard deviation 8.46); the mean final IOP was 13.61 mmHg (range 5-35, SD 4.73), with a mean reduction of 42.21%. The mean change in glaucoma medications was -1.64. 78.40% experienced a reduction in glaucoma treatment. Post-operatively, 43.80% had no complications; this improved to 85.0% when numerical hypotony and raised IOP without visual sequelae were excluded. Further procedures required included Nd:YAG goniopuncture (10%), bleb needling (13.75%) or revision (7.5%), iridectomy (3.75%), goniosynechiolysis (1.25%), and autologous blood injection (1.25%). Two eyes were converted to trabeculectomy peri-operatively, with seven overall (8.75%) requiring trabeculectomy over the course of follow-up. 3.75% underwent glaucoma drainage device implantation, and 3.75% underwent cyclodiode laser. Conclusion We have found DS to be a safe, effective procedure for selected patients where trabeculectomy has a high likelihood of failure or where a higher IOP can be tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.