Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37700994›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Blood Donation Patterns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abhay Kumar, Sushma Kumari, Usha Saroj, Ashwini Verma, Kumari Asha Kiran, Manoj Kumar Prasad, Rashmi Sinha, Mani Bhushan K Sinha

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Blood safety and epidemiological trends of blood-borne infections in Brazil: A retrospective analysis.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abhay KumarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Sushma KumariDepartment of Blood Bank, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Usha SarojDepartment of Blood Bank, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Ashwini VermaDepartment of Microbiology, Phulo Jhano Medical College, Dumka, IND.
Kumari Asha KiranDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Manoj Kumar PrasadDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Rashmi SinhaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Mani Bhushan K SinhaDepartment of Physiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences · INMaharani Laxmi Bai Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood centers, which are arguably the backbone of every hospital, depend on blood donors for a constant and regular supply of blood. Like many other fields, the COVID-19 pandemic severely affected blood donations. In this article, we aim to systematically search the studies done on blood donation during the COVID-19 pandemic period, analyze the pandemic's effect on blood donation, and examine the methodology used to overcome the problem. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on blood donation. Two independent reviewers searched different databases, such as PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for overall study characteristics. We included a total of 15 studies. There was an overall decrease in blood donation of 25%, with some regions showing a decrease of as much as 71%. However, some regions were able to experience a 2-10% increase in blood donation after taking stringent and early measures to prevent such decreases. The COVID-19 pandemic and consequent lockdown greatly affected blood transfusion services, resulting in a progressive decline in blood donations that threatened the lives of many patients who were fully dependent on blood transfusion. However, by making appropriate and early decisions and taking action, policymakers and the rest of society can prevent such shortages, potentially saving millions of lives.

Indexed as

blood donationblood transfusioncovid-19meta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37700994
PMCPMC10495075
OpenAlexW4385783687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.