ArticleCureus2023
An Evaluation of T-Regulatory Cells and Inflammatory Cytokines in Preeclampsia.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Preeclampsia (PE) is a prenatal hypertension condition with unknown aetiology which is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality, premature delivery, and foetal and neonatal mortality. T-regulatory cells (T-regs) are the specific subsets of T-lymphocytes that play a key role in the mechanisms of maternal-foetal tolerance, contributing to an effective immunological role in protecting the allogenic foetus during pregnancy and preventing pregnancy-related complications. This study evaluated the T-regs in PE and correlated the T-regs with inflammatory markers in the pathophysiology and for early diagnosis of PE. Methods After clearance from Institutional Ethics Committee, the participants were recruited from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Three study groups were included a) normal reproductive age group women b) normal pregnant women c) PE pregnant women. 5 ml of venous blood was collected from each participant. Biochemical and haematological parameters estimation was done in Hospital's central laboratory. T-regs (CD4, CD25, FOXP3) were assessed using a flow-cytometer, and inflammatory markers (TGF-β1, IL-6, hsCRP) were assessed by ELISA and Beckman Coulter autoanalyzer in the Department of Biochemistry, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar. Results We found that the levels of CD4+CD25+ T-regs were lower in PE than in normal pregnancy, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.349). The levels of CD4+FOXP3+ T-regs in PE were significantly lower compared to both normal pregnant women (p = 0.001) and normal non-pregnant women (p = 0.001). In comparison to women with PE, the levels of TGF-β1 were significantly higher in normal non-pregnant women (p = 0.020) and were higher, although not significantly so, in normal pregnant women (p = 0.994). The levels of IL-6 in women with PE were significantly higher than in normal pregnant women (p = 0.01) and normal non-pregnant women (p = 0.048). The levels of hsCRP in women with PE were significantly higher than in normal pregnant women (p = 0.045) and were higher, but not statistically significant, compared to normal non-pregnant women (p = 0.094). Conclusion The results of the study, showing a decrease in T-regs and an increase in inflammatory markers like TGF-β1, IL-6, and hsCRP levels in PE, have potential implications for the early diagnosis and management of the condition. Incorporating assessments of CD4+FOXP3+ T-regs and inflammatory markers into screening protocols, along with regular prenatal care and monitoring, can aid in the timely detection and implementation of appropriate management strategies. By intervening early, the risks associated with PE can be reduced, optimizing both maternal and fetal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.