Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37700908›Full record

ReviewAnimal reproduction2023

Paternal effects on fetal programming.

Carl Robertson Dahlen, Samat Amat, Joel S Caton, Matthew S Crouse, Wellison Jarles Da Silva Diniz, Lawrence P Reynolds

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal reproduction, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carl Robertson DahlenCenter for Nutrition and Pregnancy and Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4556-4315
Samat AmatDepartment of Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6824-2431
Joel S CatonCenter for Nutrition and Pregnancy and Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.
Matthew S CrouseU.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, NE, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4579-2737
Wellison Jarles Da Silva DinizDepartment of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1082-5535
Lawrence P ReynoldsCenter for Nutrition and Pregnancy and Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6838-7809
Dakota State University · USAuburn University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paternal programming is the concept that the environmental signals from the sire's experiences leading up to mating can alter semen and ultimately affect the phenotype of resulting offspring. Potential mechanisms carrying the paternal effects to offspring can be associated with epigenetic signatures (DNA methylation, histone modification and non-coding RNAs), oxidative stress, cytokines, and the seminal microbiome. Several opportunities exist for sperm/semen to be influenced during development; these opportunities are within the testicle, the epididymis, or accessory sex glands. Epigenetic signatures of sperm can be impacted during the pre-natal and pre-pubertal periods, during sexual maturity and with advancing sire age. Sperm are susceptible to alterations as dictated by their developmental stage at the time of the perturbation, and sperm and seminal plasma likely have both dependent and independent effects on offspring. Research using rodent models has revealed that many factors including over/under nutrition, dietary fat, protein, and ingredient composition (e.g., macro- or micronutrients), stress, exercise, and exposure to drugs, alcohol, and endocrine disruptors all elicit paternal programming responses that are evident in offspring phenotype. Research using livestock species has also revealed that sire age, fertility level, plane of nutrition, and heat stress can induce alterations in the epigenetic, oxidative stress, cytokine, and microbiome profiles of sperm and/or seminal plasma. In addition, recent findings in pigs, sheep, and cattle have indicated programming effects in blastocysts post-fertilization with some continuing into post-natal life of the offspring. Our research group is focused on understanding the effects of common management scenarios of plane of nutrition and growth rates in bulls and rams on mechanisms resulting in paternal programming and subsequent offspring outcomes. Understanding the implication of paternal programming is imperative as short-term feeding and management decisions have the potential to impact productivity and profitability of our herds for generations to come.

Indexed as

epigeneticsfetal programmingoffspring outcomespaternal programmingsire

Identifiers

PMID37700908
PMCPMC10494885
OpenAlexW4386237099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.