ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2023
Trends in the use for labor analgesia in twin pregnancies: A nationwide register-based analysis in Finland.
Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anesthetic approaches for malpresentation and multiple gestation.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study is to calculate the trends in the use of labor analgesia in vaginal twin pregnancies at or after 37 Study design: Data from the National Medical Birth Register during the years 2004-2018 was used to evaluate the usage of labor analgesia in vaginal twin deliveries at or after 37 Results: A total of 3060 twin deliveries and 669 718 singleton deliveries (comparison group) were included in our study. The use of spinal analgesia in vaginal twin deliveries has shown a steadily growing trend increasing from 7.8% (95% Ci 4.8, 12.0) in 2004-24.8% (95% Ci 16.0, 33.0) in 2018. When compared to singleton deliveries, there was increased use of epidural analgesia (57.3% vs 46.1%, aOR 1.41; 95% Ci 1.31, 1.51), but lower use of spinal analgesia (12.3% vs 16.7%, aOR 0.66; 95% Ci 0.59, 0.73), another medical (7.9% vs 12.5%, aOR 0.55; 95% Ci 0.48, 0.63), and nonmedical analgesia (21.8% vs 30.2%, aOR 0.69, 95% Ci 0.63, 0.76) observed among women with twin pregnancies. Conclusions: The main finding of this study was that women with twin pregnancies had a higher rate of epidural analgesia than women with singleton pregnancies. The results of this study should be acknowledged by midwives, obstetricians, and anesthesiologists to provide optimal pain relief for mothers with twin pregnancies and encourage researchers to further research on this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.