ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Impact of HR-HPV infection on oncological outcomes in early cervical cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interaction ofOpen life sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the differences in long-term oncological outcomes between high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) negative and HR-HPV positive early-stage cervical cancers. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 2061 cases of early-stage cervical cancer from the Chinese cervical cancer clinical diagnosis and treatment database. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe the survival outcomes of different HR-HPV infections. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze and determine independent risk factors. Results: K-M analysis revealed no significant difference in 5-year OS between HR-HPV negative and HR-HPV positive groups (OS: 95.0% vs.95.6%, P=0.900). A significant difference was observed in 5-year DFS between the HR-HPV negative and HR-HPV positive groups (DFS: 87.2% vs.91.9%, P=0.025). Cox proportional hazard regression model indicated that HR-HPV infection (negative vs. positive) was an independent factor influencing 5-year DFS after early cervical cancer surgery (DFS: hazard ratio [HR]=1.862, P=0.022). HR-HPV infection (negative vs positive) was not an independent factor influencing 5-year OS after early cervical cancer surgery (OS: P=0.813). After 1:1 PSM pairing, there was no significant difference in 5-year OS and DFS between HR-HPV negative group and HR-HPV positive group (OS: 91.6% vs.95.0%, P=0.297; DFS: 87.2% vs.85.1%, P=0.758). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that HR-HPV infection was not an independent factor influencing 5-year OS and DFS after early cervical cancer surgery (OS: P=0.806, DFS: P=0.251). Conclusions: The tumour results of HR-HPV negative group and HR-HPV positive group were similar, after eliminating the differences in known variables that affect the oncological outcomes of cervical cancer. The treatment plan of HR-HPV positive cervical cancer is suitable for HR-HPV negative cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.