Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37700794›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia reports

Low-dose sevoflurane co-administered with propofol-based general anaesthesia obliterates intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring in an infant.

H Nakahari, N C T Wilton, M Ikeda, T Kojima

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Short-term and long-term effects of sevoflurane inhalationWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H NakahariDepartment of Anaesthesia Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center Obu Japan.
N C T WiltonDepartment of Anaesthesia Starship Children's Hospital Auckland New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2939-8513
M IkedaDepartment of Clinical Engineering Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center Obu Japan.
T KojimaDepartment of Anaesthesia Starship Children's Hospital Auckland New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7136-9815
Children's Medical Center · IRStarship Children's Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence of general anaesthetic agents on intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring in neonates and infants has rarely been reported. Propofol-based anaesthesia is recommended to avoid suppression of neurophysiological monitoring. However, the administration of propofol in children undergoing prolonged procedures, especially those younger than six months, should be carefully controlled due to the potential risk of propofol infusion syndrome. Adding a small dose of inhalational anaesthetic can be an option to reduce propofol requirements. Recent guidelines in Japan suggest limiting inhalational anaesthetics to less than 0.5 minimum alveolar concentrations when co-administered with low-dose propofol during intra-operative neuromonitoring. However, there is still insufficient evidence regarding the impact of sevoflurane on neurophysiological monitoring when co-administered with propofol in infants. This report describes a case of a three-month-old infant undergoing spinal lipoma resection in which there was a dramatic suppression of neurophysiological monitoring with the addition of 0.35-0.45% sevoflurane to propofol-based anaesthesia.

Indexed as

infantsintraoperative neurophysiological monitoringmotor evoked potentialssevofluranetotal intravenous anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID37700794
PMCPMC10493166
OpenAlexW4386587912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.