Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37700644›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Individual preferences for sound tool design in a parrot.

R Heinsohn, C N Zdenek, D Appleby, J A Endler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Individual preferences for sound tool design in a parrot.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R HeinsohnFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2514-9448
C N ZdenekSchool of Biological Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
D ApplebyFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3132-0985
J A EndlerZoology and Ecology, Tropical Environments Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland 4878, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rarity of tool manufacture in wild parrots is surprising because they share key life-history traits with advanced tool-using species, including large brains, complex sociality and prolonged parental care. When it does occur, tool manufacture in parrots tends to be innovative, spontaneous and individually variable, but most cases have been in captivity. In the wild, only palm cockatoos (

Indexed as

CockatoosParrotsAnimalsAustraliaBrainCommerceMaleTreesparrotsound tooltool designtool manufacturetool type

Identifiers

PMID37700644
PMCPMC10498050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.