Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37700512›Full record

ArticleJournal of analytical toxicology2023

High-throughput quantification of emerging "nitazene" benzimidazole opioid analogs by microextraction and UHPLC-MS-MS.

Maria Schüller, Ivana Lucic, Åse Marit Leere Øiestad, Stig Pedersen-Bjergaard, Elisabeth Leere Øiestad

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of analytical toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Interpol review of forensic toxicology, 2023-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 5-Methyl etodesnitazene human metabolism: LC-ESIAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria SchüllerDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1068 Blindern, Oslo 0316, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2072-4810
Ivana LucicDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1068 Blindern, Oslo 0316, Norway.
Åse Marit Leere ØiestadDepartment of Forensic Sciences, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4459 Nydalen, Oslo 0424, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7909-5863
Stig Pedersen-BjergaardDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1068 Blindern, Oslo 0316, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1666-8043
Elisabeth Leere ØiestadDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1068 Blindern, Oslo 0316, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0781-6865
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benzimidazole opioids, often referred to as nitazenes, represent a subgroup of new psychoactive substances with a recent increase in fatal overdoses in the USA and Europe. With a variety of analogs emerging on the illicit drug market, forensic laboratories are challenged to identify these potent drugs. We here present a simple quantitative approach for the determination of nine nitazene analogs, namely, clonitazene, etodesnitazene, etonitazene, etonitazepyne, flunitazene, isotonitazene, metodesnitazene, metonitazene and protonitazene in whole blood using liquid-phase microextraction and electromembrane extraction in a 96-well format and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Green and efficient sample preparation was accomplished by liquid-phase microextraction in a 96-well format and resulted in high extraction yields for all analytes (>81%). Here, blood diluted with buffer (1:1, %v) was extracted from a donor compartment across a thin organic liquid membrane and into an aqueous acceptor solution. The acceptor solution was collected and directly injected into the analysis platform. Chromatographic separation was accomplished with a biphenyl column, allowing for a baseline separation of the structural isomers isotonitazene and protonitazene before detection by multiple reaction monitoring. Validation was performed according to Scientific Working Group of Forensic Toxicology guidelines. The calibration range was from 0.5 to 50 nM (except for protonitazene and clonitazene from 0.1 nM) with good linearity and limits of detection down to 0.01 nM. An AGREEprep assessment was performed to evaluate sample preparation greenness, with a final score of 0.71. Nitazenes represent a current threat to public health, and analytical methods that cover a wide range of these analogs are limited. Here, the described method may assist in the detection of nitazenes in whole blood and prevent these substances from being missed in postmortem investigations.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsTandem Mass SpectrometryAnalgesics, OpioidBenzimidazolesChromatography, High Pressure LiquidAnalgesics, OpioidBenzimidazolesIllicit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID37700512
PMCPMC10714918
OpenAlexW4386694521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.