Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37700323›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023

A diagnostic model for sepsis-induced acute lung injury using a consensus machine learning approach and its therapeutic implications.

Yongxin Zheng, Jinping Wang, Zhaoyi Ling, Jiamei Zhang, Yuan Zeng, Ke Wang, Yu Zhang, Lingbo Nong, Ling Sang, Yonghao Xu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yongxin Zheng *Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Jinping Wang *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong,, China.
Zhaoyi Ling *Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Jiamei ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Yuan ZengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Ke WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Lingbo NongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Ling SangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Yonghao XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Xiaoqing LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Yimin LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China. dryiminli@vip.163.com.
Yongbo HuangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China. yongbo2046@163.com.
Guangzhou Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA significant proportion of septic patients with acute lung injury (ALI) are recognized late due to the absence of an efficient diagnostic test, leading to the postponed treatments and consequently higher mortality. Identifying diagnostic biomarkers may improve screening to identify septic patients at high risk of ALI earlier and provide the potential effective therapeutic drugs. Machine learning represents a powerful approach for making sense of complex gene expression data to find robust ALI diagnostic biomarkers.

methodsThe datasets were obtained from GEO and ArrayExpress databases. Following quality control and normalization, the datasets (GSE66890, GSE10474 and GSE32707) were merged as the training set, and four machine learning feature selection methods (Elastic net, SVM, random forest and XGBoost) were applied to construct the diagnostic model. The other datasets were considered as the validation sets. To further evaluate the performance and predictive value of diagnostic model, nomogram, Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) and Clinical Impact Curve (CIC) were constructed. Finally, the potential small molecular compounds interacting with selected features were explored from the CTD database.

resultsThe results of GSEA showed that immune response and metabolism might play an important role in the pathogenesis of sepsis-induced ALI. Then, 52 genes were identified as putative biomarkers by consensus feature selection from all four methods. Among them, 5 genes (ARHGDIB, ALDH1A1, TACR3, TREM1 and PI3) were selected by all methods and used to predict ALI diagnosis with high accuracy. The external datasets (E-MTAB-5273 and E-MTAB-5274) demonstrated that the diagnostic model had great accuracy with AUC value of 0.725 and 0.833, respectively. In addition, the nomogram, DCA and CIC showed that the diagnostic model had great performance and predictive value. Finally, the small molecular compounds (Curcumin, Tretinoin, Acetaminophen, Estradiol and Dexamethasone) were screened as the potential therapeutic agents for sepsis-induced ALI.

conclusionThis consensus of multiple machine learning algorithms identified 5 genes that were able to distinguish ALI from septic patients. The diagnostic model could identify septic patients at high risk of ALI, and provide potential therapeutic targets for sepsis-induced ALI.

Indexed as

Acute Lung InjurySepsisAcetaminophenConsensusHumansMachine Learningrho Guanine Nucleotide Dissociation Inhibitor betaAcetaminophenARHGDIB protein, humanrho Guanine Nucleotide Dissociation Inhibitor betaAcute lung injuryAcute respiratory distress syndromeMachine learningSepsisTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID37700323
PMCPMC10498641
OpenAlexW4386632252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.