ArticleBMC health services research2023
Rural patient and provider perceptions of telehealth implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital and Remote Health for Older Adults in Rural or Underserved Settings: Systematic Review of Clinical, Behavioral, and Implementation Outcomes.JMIR aging · 2026Pooled it
- Enhanced recruitment methods for a dietary intervention trial aimed at reducing risk of colorectal cancer.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Continuity of Telehealth Usage Among Hispanics: The Impact of Language Barriers.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Rural-Urban and Racial-Ethnic Differences in Tele-Behavioral Health Access for Medicaid Beneficiaries.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Article
- Provider-level variation in the delivery of primary care telehealth for the rural Medicare Advantage population.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Article
- Patient and clinician satisfaction with home parenteral nutrition intestinal failure telemedicine consultations: A survey of clinicians and patients.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025Article
- Impak Sihat: A telehealth system development and feasibility evaluation to empower rural population in Malaysia on the quality use of medicines.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
- The Role of Sustainability in Telemedicine Services: The Case of the Greek National Telemedicine Network.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Barriers and facilitators to physicians' telemedicine uptake during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- The use of telemedicine in family medicine: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Characterizing Telehealth Barriers and Preferences to Promote Acceptable Implementation Strategies in Central Uganda: Multilevel Formative Evaluation.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Healthcare Providers and Patients Perception on Telehealth Services Adoption for Post-Operative Follow-Ups at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (Ghana).Health services insights · 2025Article
- Racial and Ethnic and Rural Variations in the Use of Hybrid Prenatal Care in the US.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Patient-reported convenience and effectiveness of telehealth for breast cancer management.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Review
- Patients' and Clinicians' Experiences with In-person, Video, and Phone Modalities for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: A Qualitative Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Attitudes and barriers toward video visits in surgical care: Insights from a nationwide survey among surgeons.Surgery · 2024Article
- Evaluating variations in the barriers to colorectal cancer screening associated with telehealth use in rural U.S. Pacific Northwest.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Identifying policy alternatives to enable the virtual establishment of a veterinarian-client-patient relationship.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding perceptions of telehealth implementation from patients and providers can improve the utility and sustainability of these programs, particularly in under-resourced rural settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate both patient and provider perceptions of telehealth visits in a large rural healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic. To promote sustainability of telehealth approaches, we also assessed whether the percentage of missed appointments differed between in-person and telehealth visits.
methodsUsing anonymous surveys, we evaluated patient preferences and satisfaction with telehealth visits from November 2020 -March 2021 and assessed perceptions of telehealth efficiency and value among rural providers from September-October 2020. We examined whether telehealth perceptions differed according to patients' age, educational attainment, insurance status, and distance to clinical site and providers' age and length of time practicing medicine using ANOVA test. We also examined whether the percentage of missed appointments differed between in-person and telehealth visits at a family practice clinic within the rural healthcare system from April to September 2020 using a Chi-square test.
resultsOver 73% of rural patients had favorable perceptions of telehealth visits, and satisfaction was generally higher among younger patients. Patients reported difficulty with scheduling follow-up appointments, lack of personal contact and technology challenges as common barriers. Over 80% of the 219 providers responding to the survey reported that telehealth added value to their practice, while 36.6% agreed that telehealth visits are more efficient than in-person visits. Perception of telehealth value and efficiency did not differ by provider age (p = 0.67 and p = 0.67, respectively) or time in practice (p = 0.53 and p = 0.44, respectively). Technology challenges for the patient (91.3%) and provider (45.1%) were commonly reported. The percentage of missed appointments was slightly higher for telehealth visits compared to in-person visits, but the difference was not statistically significant (8.7% vs. 8.0%; p = 0.39).
conclusionsTelehealth perceptions were generally favorable among rural patients and providers, although satisfaction was lower among older patients and providers. Our findings suggest that telehealth approaches may add value and efficiency to rural clinical practice. However, technology issues for both patients and providers and gaps in care coordination need to be addressed to promote sustainability of telehealth approaches in rural practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.