Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37700144›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2023

The influence of altruistic personality, interpersonal distance and social observation on prosocial behavior: An event-related potential (ERP) study.

Mei Li, Jin Li, Guanfei Zhang, Wei Fan, Yiping Zhong, Hong Li

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mei LiDepartment of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, No. 36 Lushan Road, Yuelu Dist., Changsha, 410081, Hunan, China.
Jin LiDepartment of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, No. 36 Lushan Road, Yuelu Dist., Changsha, 410081, Hunan, China.
Guanfei ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, No. 36 Lushan Road, Yuelu Dist., Changsha, 410081, Hunan, China.
Wei FanDepartment of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, No. 36 Lushan Road, Yuelu Dist., Changsha, 410081, Hunan, China.
Yiping ZhongDepartment of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, No. 36 Lushan Road, Yuelu Dist., Changsha, 410081, Hunan, China. ypzhong@hunnu.edu.cn.
Hong LiDepartment of Psychology, South China Normal University, No. 55 Zhongshan Road, TianHe Dist., Guangzhou, 510631, China. lihong_psych@m.scnu.edu.cn.
Hunan Normal University · CNSouth China Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The psychological mechanisms that high and low altruists exhibit in different contexts remain unknown. This study examined the underlying mechanisms of the effect of altruistic personality, social observation, and interpersonal distance on prosocial behavior using event-related potentials (ERPs). Participants with high and low altruism were asked to make prosocial or non-prosocial choices toward different interpersonal distances (friends, acquaintances, or strangers) under the (non)observer condition. The electrophysiological responses to the choice stimuli were simultaneously recorded. The behavioral results demonstrated that high altruists had more prosocial choices, and these choices were unaffected by interpersonal distance and social observation. However, low altruists made more prosocial choices toward friends and acquaintances under the observer than nonobserver conditions, whereas their prosocial choices toward strangers showed no difference. The ERP results demonstrated that low altruists showed more negative N2 when the choice stimuli were toward strangers and acquaintances or under the nonobserver condition. Furthermore, low altruists showed larger P3 under the observer than nonobserver conditions when the choice stimuli were toward friends and acquaintances, while this difference was absent when the choice stimuli were toward strangers. However, for high altruists, no effect of interpersonal distance and social observation was observed in N2 and P3. These results suggest that the prosocial behavior of low altruists is mainly driven by reputational incentives, whereas high altruists are primarily motivated by concern about the well-being of others. Our findings provide insights into the prosocial behavior of high and low altruists in different contexts and support the empathy-altruism hypothesis.

Indexed as

AltruismEmpathyEvoked PotentialsFriendsHumansMotivationSocial BehaviorAltruistic personalityERPsInterpersonal distanceP3Prosocial behaviorsSocial observation

Identifiers

PMID37700144
OpenAlexW4386631877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.