Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37700111›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2023

Backyard aerosol pollution monitors: foliar surfaces, dust enrichment, and factors influencing foliar retention.

Kira Zeider, Iliana Manjón, Eric A Betterton, A Eduardo Sáez, Armin Sorooshian, Mónica D Ramírez-Andreotta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kira ZeiderDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1042-749X
Iliana ManjónDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Eric A BettertonDepartment of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, 1177 E Fourth Street, Rm. 429, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
A Eduardo SáezDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Armin SorooshianDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Mónica D Ramírez-AndreottaDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. mdramire@arizona.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6220-5763
University of Arizona · US

Funding

TRANSPORT OF TRACE METALS IN A POLLUTED AQUIFERP42ES004940 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Xinxin Ding · 1990 to 2026
$68.1M
SOUTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES CENTERP30ES006694 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI DEAN BILLHEIMER · 1994 to 2026
$36.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES006694NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Air pollution is one of the leading causes of death from noncommunicable diseases globally, and in Arizona, both mining activities and abandoned agriculture can generate erodible dust. This dust is transported via wind and can carry high amounts of toxic pollutants. Industry-adjacent communities, or "fenceline communities," are generally closer to the pollution sources and are disproportionally impacted by pollution, or in this case, dust. The dust transported from the mine settles into nearby rivers, gardens, and homes, and increases the concentrations of elements beyond their naturally occurring amounts (i.e., enriched). This study was built upon previous community science work in which plant leaves were observed to collect similar concentrations to an accepted dust collection method and illustrated promise for their use as low-cost air quality monitors in these communities. This work investigated the concentration of Na, Mg, Al, K, Ca, Mn, Co, Cu, Zn, Mo, and Ba in dust from the leaves of community-collected backyard and garden plants (foliar dust), as well as if certain variables affected collection efficacy. This assessment evaluated (1) foliar concentration versus surface area for 11 elements, (2) enrichment factor (EF) values and ratios, (3) comparisons of foliar, garden, and yard samples to US Geological Survey data, and (4) what variable significantly affected dust collection efficacy. The EF results indicate that many of the samples were enriched (anthropogenically contaminated) and that the foliar samples were generally more contaminated than the yard and garden soil samples. Leaf surface area was the most influential factor for leaf collection efficiency (p < 0.05) compared to plant family or sampling location. Further studies are needed that standardize the plant species and age and include multiple replicates of the same plant species across partnering communities. This study has demonstrated that foliar dust is enriched in the participating partnering communities and that plant leaf samples can serve as backyard aerosol pollution monitors. Therefore, foliar dust is a viable indicator of outdoor settled dust and aerosol contamination and this is an adoptable monitoring technique for "fenceline communities."

Indexed as

Air PollutionDustAerosolsEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutionAerosolsDustAir monitorCo-created community scienceFoliarFugitive dustMining

Identifiers

PMID37700111
PMCPMC10636967
OpenAlexW4386705402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.