Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37700025›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Monitoring the impacts of crop residue cover on agricultural productivity and soil chemical and physical characteristics.

Mohammad Kazemi Garajeh, Keyvan Hassangholizadeh, Amir Reza Bakhshi Lomer, Amin Ranjbari, Ladan Ebadi, Mostafa Sadeghnejad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Mohammad Kazemi GarajehDepartment of Civil, Constructional and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00138, Rome, Italy. kazemi20.0432@gmail.com.
Keyvan HassangholizadehDepartment of Remote Sensing and GIS, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Amir Reza Bakhshi LomerDepartment of Geography, Birkbeck, University of London, London, WC1E 7HX, UK.
Amin RanjbariDepartment of Remote Sensing and GIS, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Ladan EbadiDepartment of Surveying Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Golestan University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran.
Mostafa SadeghnejadDepartment of Geography and Geospatial Sciences, Kansas State University, 920 N17th Street, Manhattan, KS, USA.
University of Tabriz · IRBirkbeck, University of London · GBGolestan University · IRKansas State University · USSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To the best of our knowledge, the impacts of crop residue cover (CRC) on agricultural productivity and soil fertility have not been studied by previous researchers. In this regard, this study aims to apply an integrated approach of remote sensing and geospatial analysis to detect CRC and monitor the effects of CRC on agricultural productivity, as well as soil chemical and physical characteristics. To achieve this, a series of Landsat images and 275 ground control points (GCPs) collected from the study areas for the years 2013, 2015, and 2021 were used. A convolutional neural network (CNN), a class of artificial neural network has commonly applied to analyze visual imagery, was employed in this study for CRC detection in two classes (Not-CRC and CRC) for the years 2013, 2015, and 2021. To assess the effects of CRC, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was applied to Landsat image series for the years 2015 (22 images), 2019 (20 images), and 2022 (23 images). Furthermore, this study evaluates the impacts of CRC on soil fertility based on collected field observation data. The results show a high performance (Accuracy of > 0.95) of the CNN for CRC detection and mapping. The findings also reveal positive effects of CRC on agricultural productivity, indicating an increase in vegetation density by about 0.1909 and 0.1377 for study areas 1 and 2, respectively, from 2015 to 2022. The results also indicate an increase in soil chemical and physical characteristics, including EC, PH, Na, Mg, HCO

Identifiers

PMID37700025
PMCPMC10497602
OpenAlexW4386686743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.