ArticleScientific reports2023
Exploring the dynamics of viscoelastic adhesion in rough line contacts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mesoscopic Contact Dynamics of Emulsions: Influence of Droplet Size on Nanoindentation Behavior.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modeling the adhesion of viscoelastic rough surfaces is a recent challenge in contact mechanics. Existing models have primarily focused on simple systems with smooth topography or single roughness scale due to the co-action of roughness and viscoelasticity leading to elastic instabilities and rate-dependent behavior, resulting in complex adhesion dynamics. In this study, we propose a numerical model based on a finite element methodology to investigate the adhesion between a randomly rough profile and a viscoelastic half-plane. Approach-retraction simulations are performed under controlled displacement conditions of the rough indenter. The results demonstrate that viscous effects dampen the roughness-induced instabilities in both the approach and retraction phases. Interestingly, even when viscous effects are negligible, the pull-off stress, i.e., the maximum tensile stress required to detach the surfaces, is found to depend on the stiffness modulus and maximum load reached during the approach. Furthermore, when unloading is performed from a relaxed state of the viscoelastic half-plane, both adhesion hysteresis and pull-off stress are monotonic increasing functions of the speed. Conversely, when retraction begins from an unrelaxed state of the material, the maximum pull-off stress and hysteretic loss are obtained at intermediate velocities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.