Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37699705›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2023

How Sucrose Preference Is Gained and Lost: An In-Depth Analysis of Drinking Behavior during the Sucrose Preference Test in Mice.

Andreas B Wulff, Phylicia Cooper, Emmanuela Kodjo, Eliana Abel, Scott M Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Computationally Informed Insights Into Anhedonia and Treatment by Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonism.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Trial
  2. On the importance of including both sexes in animal studies - insights from home-cage monitoring.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. KAlcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Role ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. The antipsychotic potential ofIBRO neuroscience reports · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas B WulffDepartment of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201.ORCID 0000-0002-5610-4330
Phylicia CooperDepartment of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201.
Emmanuela KodjoDepartment of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201.
Eliana AbelDepartment of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201.
Scott M ThompsonDepartment of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201 scott.m.thompson@cuanschutz.edu.

Funding

ASCEND Training Model to Increase Diversity in the Biomedical Research WorkforceRL5GM118972 · NIGMS · MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HOHMANN, CHRISTINE F, SHEIKHATTARI, PAYAM · 2015 to 2023
$8.1M
Stress, Depression, Serotonin, and Plasticity of Excitatory TransmissionR01MH086828 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI THOMPSON, SCOTT M. · 2010 to 2019
$3.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS RL5 GM118972NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sucrose preference test (SPT) is a widely used preclinical assay for studying stress-sensitive reward behaviors and antidepressant treatments in rodents, with some face, construct, and predictive validity. However, while stress-induced loss of sucrose preference is presumed to reflect an anhedonic-like state, little detail is known about what behavioral components may influence performance in the SPT in stress-naive or stressed rodents. We analyzed the licking microstructure of mice during the SPT to evaluate how preference is expressed and lost following chronic stress. In stress-naive mice, preference is expressed as both longer and more numerous drinking bouts at the sucrose bottle, compared with the water bottle. We also found evidence that memory of the sucrose bottle location supports preference. Through manipulations of the caloric content of the sweetener or caloric need of the mouse, we found that energy demands and satiety signals do not affect either preference or the underlying drinking behavior. Both acute and chronic stress impaired sucrose location memory and reduced the number of drinking bouts at the sucrose bottle, the latter of which explained the loss of sucrose preference in stress susceptible mice compared with stress resilient mice. Female mice generally exhibited similar drinking behavior to male mice but may be less susceptible to chronic stress and display better memory performance than male mice, both before and after chronic stress. Our data suggest that chronic stress inhibits a sucrose preference by reducing reward seeking behavior without affecting palatability.

Indexed as

SucroseSweetening AgentsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrinking BehaviorFemaleMaleMiceSucroseSweetening Agentsanhedoniadepressionlickometryrewardstress

Identifiers

PMID37699705
PMCPMC10540674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.