Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37699638›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Career intentions of medical students in the UK: a national, cross-sectional study (AIMS study).

Tomas Ferreira, Alexander M Collins, Oliver Feng, Richard J Samworth, Rita Horvath, AIMS Collaborative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Quality in postgraduate medical education: A contested idea.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. "Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tomas FerreiraSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK tf385@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1465-522X
Alexander M CollinsSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Oliver FengStatistical Laboratory, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Richard J SamworthStatistical Laboratory, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rita HorvathSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
AIMS Collaborative

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000848Medical Research Council MR/N025431/2Medical Research Council MR/V009346/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine current UK medical students' career intentions after graduation and on completing the Foundation Programme (FP), and to ascertain the motivations behind these intentions.

designCross-sectional, mixed-methods survey of UK medical students, using a non-random sampling method.

settingAll 44 UK medical schools recognised by the General Medical Council.

participantsAll UK medical students were eligible to participate. The study sample consisted of 10 486 participants, approximately 25.50% of the medical student population. OUTCOME MEASURES: Career intentions of medical students postgraduation and post-FP, motivations behind these career intentions, characterising the medical student population and correlating demographic factors and propensity to leave the National Health Service (NHS).

resultsThe majority of participating students (8806/10 486, 83.98%) planned to complete both years of the FP after graduation, with under half of these students (4294/8806, 48.76%) intending to pursue specialty training thereafter. A subanalysis of career intentions after the FP by year of study revealed a significant decrease in students' intentions to enter specialty training as they advanced through medical school. Approximately a third of surveyed students (3392/10 486, 32.35%) intended to emigrate to practise medicine, with 42.57% (n=1444) of those students not planning to return. In total, 2.89% of students intended to leave medicine altogether (n=303). Remuneration, work-life balance and working conditions were identified as important factors in decision-making regarding emigration and leaving the profession. Subgroup analyses based on gender, type of schooling, fee type and educational background were performed. Only 17.26% of surveyed students were satisfied or very satisfied with the overall prospect of working in the NHS.

conclusionsThe Ascertaining the career Intentions of UK Medical Students study highlights UK students' views and career intentions, revealing a concerning proportion of those surveyed considering alternative careers or emigration. Addressing factors such as remuneration, work-life balance and working conditions may increase retention of doctors and improve workforce planning efforts.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIntentionState MedicineUnited Kingdomhealth economicshealth educationhealth policymedical education & trainingorganisation of health servicesqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID37699638
PMCPMC10496670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.