Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37699637›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Prevention and promotion effects of Self Help Plus: secondary analysis of cluster randomised controlled trial data among South Sudanese refugee women in Uganda.

Jura Augustinavicius, Marianna Purgato, Federico Tedeschi, Rashelle Musci, Marx Ronald Leku, Kenneth Carswell, Daniel Lakin, Mark van Ommeren, Pim Cuijpers, Marit Sijbrandij and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Jura AugustinaviciusSchool of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada jura.augustinavicius@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-6763-2027
Marianna PurgatoWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3783-8195
Federico TedeschiWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy.
Rashelle MusciDepartment of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Marx Ronald LekuHealthRight International, Arua, Uganda.
Kenneth CarswellDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
Daniel LakinDepartment of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mark van OmmerenDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
Pim CuijpersDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Section of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5497-2743
Marit SijbrandijDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Section of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Eirini KaryotakiDepartment of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Section of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Wietse A Tol *Global Health Section, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.
Corrado Barbui *WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Verona · ITVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLWorld Health Organization · CHUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEvidence-based and scalable prevention and promotion focused mental health and psychosocial support interventions are needed for conflict-affected populations in humanitarian settings. This study retrospectively assessed whether participation in Self Help Plus (SH+) versus enhanced usual care (EUC) resulted in reduced incidence of probable mental disorder and increased positive mental health and well-being post-intervention among South Sudanese refugee women in Uganda.

methodsThis study used secondary data from treatment-oriented pilot (n=50) and fully-powered cluster randomised controlled trials (cRCT)s (n=694) of SH+ versus EUC. Data from baseline and post-intervention assessments were combined. A composite latent indicator for mental health problems was generated using mental health and well-being measures included in both cRCTs. In order to assess incidence, a binary variable approximating probable mental disorder was created to exclude those with probable mental disorder from the analysis sample and as the primary prevention outcome. The promotive effects of SH+ relative to EUC were examined in the same sample by assessing subjective well-being and psychological flexibility scale scores.

resultsA single factor for mental health problems was identified with all factor loadings >0.30 and acceptable internal consistency (α=0.70). We excluded 161 women who met criteria for probable mental disorder at baseline. Among those with at least moderate psychological distress but without probable mental disorder at baseline and with follow-up data (n=538), the incidence of probable mental disorder at post-intervention was lower among those who participated in SH+ relative to EUC (Risk ratio =0.16, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.53). Participation in SH+ versus EUC was also associated with increased subjective well-being (β=2.62, 95% CI: 1.63 to 3.60) and psychological flexibility (β=4.55, 95% CI: 2.92 to 6.18) at post-intervention assessment.

conclusionsThese results support the use and further testing of SH+ as a selective and indicated prevention and promotion focused psychosocial intervention in humanitarian settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN50148022.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersRefugeesSelf CareBlack PeopleFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesUgandaClinical trialsMENTAL HEALTHPREVENTIVE MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID37699637
PMCPMC10503328
OpenAlexW4386645364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.