Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37699625›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Understanding polysubstance use at the daily and event levels: protocol for a mixed-methods qualitative and ecological momentary assessment study in a community-based sample of people who use illicit drugs in Oakland, California, USA.

Jennifer Lorvick, Jordana Hemberg, Madeleine J George, Joy Piontak, Megan L Comfort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer LorvickCommunity Health and Implementation Research Program, RTI International, Berkeley, California, USA jlorvick@rti.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2836-3028
Jordana HembergCommunity Health and Implementation Research Program, RTI International, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5958-4210
Madeleine J GeorgeHealth of Populations Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Joy PiontakHealth of Populations Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9399-9145
Megan L ComfortTransformative Research Unit for Equity, RTI International, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

A mixed-methods study of polysubstance use to inform opioid overdose preventionR01DA049761 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI LORVICK, JENNIFER · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA049761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPolysubstance use is extremely common among people who use illicit opioids in the USA. It is associated with poor substance use treatment outcomes, infectious disease risk and alarming rates of drug overdose. Nearly all extant literature examines polysubstance use over broad time frames, such as 30 days or 6 months. However, both substance use and overdose risk are episodic. To build a stronger understanding of polysubstance use and overdose risk, we need to expand the knowledge base to include daily-level and event-level data that examine how substances are used together, in which combinations and in which contexts. The study described in this protocol will use qualitative and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods to examine polysubstance use and overdose risk on a daily and event level. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a mixed-methods observational study with three phases. The first phase is formative, consisting of qualitative interviews with people who use multiple substances (N=20), to inform the development of items for the EMA component. The second phase is EMA data collection with people who use multiple substances (N=120), three times daily for 28 days. The third phase consists of mixed-methods inquiries with a subset of participants (N=20), using participant-level EMA data and qualitative techniques to build a nuanced understanding of the motivations and contexts of polysubstance use in everyday life. Analytical induction methods will be used to interpret qualitative data. Hierarchical linear modelling methods will be used to analyse EMA data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This research has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at RTI International (#MOD00001782 for EMA procedures and #MOD00001241 for qualitative procedures). Participants engage in an informed consent procedure for each component of the study. Data will be managed and shared per the National Institutes of Health extramural data sharing policy.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseIllicit DrugsAnalgesics, OpioidCaliforniaEcological Momentary AssessmentHumansObservational Studies as TopicUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidIllicit Drugspublic healthqualitative researchsubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID37699625
PMCPMC10503366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.