Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37699152›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2023

DNA methylation biomarkers to identify epigenetically abnormal spermatozoa in male partners from couples experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss.

Kushaan Khambata, Shahina Begum, Sanketa Raut, Sweta Mohan, Delna Irani, Dipty Singh, Vandana Bansal, Anushree Patil, Nafisa H Balasinor

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reproductive Immunology and Pregnancy 3.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kushaan KhambataGamete Immunobiology Department, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9657-7968
Shahina BegumBiostatistics Department, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India.
Sanketa RautNeuroendocrinology Department, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India.
Sweta MohanNeuroendocrinology Department, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India.
Delna IraniNeuroendocrinology Department, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India.
Dipty SinghNeuroendocrinology Department, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India.
Vandana BansalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Anushree PatilClinical Research Department, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India.
Nafisa H BalasinorNeuroendocrinology Department, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India.
National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health · INBai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously, we showed that DNA methylation defects in spermatozoa from male partners of couples undergoing recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) could be a contributing paternal factor. In the present study, we aimed to determine whether the methylation levels of selected imprinted genes can be used as diagnostic markers to identify epigenetically abnormal spermatozoa sample in these cases. The methylation levels of selected imprinted genes in spermatozoa, which were previously found to be differentially methylated, were combined into a probability score (between 0-1) using multiple logistic regression. Different combinations of these genes were investigated using Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, and the threshold values were experimentally validated in an independent cohort of 38 control and 45 RPL spermatozoa samples. Among the different combinations investigated, a combination of five imprinted genes comprising IGF2-H19 DMR, IG-DMR, ZAC, KvDMR, and PEG3 (AUC = 0.88) with a threshold value of 0.61 was selected with a specificity of 90.41% and sensitivity of 70%. The results from the validation study indicated that 97% of the control samples had probability scores below this threshold, whereas 40% of the RPL samples were above this threshold with a post-hoc power of 97.8%. Thus, this combination can correctly classify control samples and potentially identify epigenetically abnormal spermatozoa samples in the male partners of couples undergoing RPL. We propose that the combined DNA methylation levels of these imprinted genes can be used as a diagnostic tool to identify spermatozoa samples with epigenetic defects which could contribute to the pathophysiology of RPL and the couple could be counselled appropriately.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationTeratozoospermiaBiomarkersEpigenomicsFemaleHumansMalePregnancyProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalBiomarkersDNA methylationimprinted genesrecurrent pregnancy lossSpermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID37699152
PMCPMC10498810
OpenAlexW4386646458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.