Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37699140›Full record

ArticleMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association2024

Evaluation of a decision support system using Bayesian network modeling in an applied Multi-INT surveillance environment.

Mary E Frame, Barbara Acker-Mills, Anna Maresca, Robert E Patterson, Erica Curtis, Regina Buccello-Stout, Justin Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary E FrameResearch and Development Department, Parallax Advanced Research, Beavercreek, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-4586-9987
Barbara Acker-MillsResearch and Development Department, Parallax Advanced Research, Beavercreek, Ohio.
Anna MarescaResearch and Development Department, Parallax Advanced Research, Beavercreek, Ohio.
Robert E Patterson711th HPW, Air Force Research Laboratory, Ohio.
Erica CurtisResearch and Development Department, Parallax Advanced Research, Beavercreek, Ohio.
Regina Buccello-StoutResearch and Development Department, Parallax Advanced Research, Beavercreek, Ohio.
Justin Nelson711th HPW, Air Force Research Laboratory, Ohio.

Funding

Air Force Research Laboratory FA8650-22-F-6401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensemaking and decision-making are fundamental components of applied Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR). Analysts acquire information from multiple sources over a period of hours, days, or even over the scale of months or years, that must be interpreted and integrated to predict future adversarial events. Sensemaking is essential for developing an appropriate mental model that will lead to accurate predictions sooner. Decision Support Systems (DSS) are one proposed solution to improve analyst decision-making outcomes by leveraging computers to conduct calculations that may be difficult for human operators and provide recommendations. In this study, we tested two simulated DSS that were informed by a Bayesian Network Model as a potential prediction-assistive tool. Participants completed a simulated multi-day, multi-source intelligence task and were asked to make predictions regarding five potential outcomes on each day. Participants in both DSS conditions were able to converge on the correct solution significantly faster than the control group, and between 36-44% more of the sample was able to reach the correct conclusion. Furthermore, we found that a DSS representing projected outcome probabilities as numerical, rather than using verbal ordinal labels, were better able to differentiate which outcomes were extremely unlikely than the control group or verbal-probability DSS.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremAdultDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultdecision-makingDecision support systemssurveillance

Identifiers

PMID37699140
PMCPMC11622587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.