Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37699059›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Financial investment risk prediction under the application of information interaction Firefly Algorithm combined with Graph Convolutional Network.

Muyang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Muyang LiBusiness school, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-9842-4265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper improves the performance of the model by Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) and Firefly Algorithm (FA) to optimize the financial investment risk prediction model. It studies the application of GCN in financial investment risk prediction model and elaborates on the role of FA in the model. To further improve the accuracy of the prediction model, this paper optimizes and improves the FA and verifies the effectiveness of the optimized model through experiments. Experimental results show that the optimized model performs well in feature selection, and the optimal accuracy of feature selection reaches 91.9%, which is much higher than that of traditional models. Meanwhile, in the analysis of the number of iterations of the model, the performance of the optimized algorithm gradually tends to be stable. When the number of iterations is 30, the optimal value is found. In the simulation experiment, when an unexpected accident occurs, the prediction accuracy of the model decreases, but the prediction performance of the optimized algorithm proposed here is significantly higher than that of the traditional model. In conclusion, the optimized model has high accuracy and reliability in financial investment risk prediction, which provides strong support for financial investment decision-making. This paper has certain reference significance for the optimization of financial investment risk prediction model.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsInvestmentsComputer SimulationReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID37699059
PMCPMC10497170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.