Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37699050›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

The sweet spot study-Developing e-liquid product standards for nicotine form and concentration to improve public health: Protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, crossover study.

Yoo Jin Cho, Marielle C Brinkman, Alice Hinton, Jean D Nshimiyimana, Toral Mehta, Ayomipo Adeniji, Kaila Norton, Ahmad El Hellani, Theodore L Wagener

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05864586 (Nicotine Concentration and Forms), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05864586 nacompletednot on this map

Nicotine Concentration and Forms: Differential Appeal to Smokers Versus Non-Smokers

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2023 to 2024Enrolled150ConditionsNicotine, Nicotine Vaping, E-cigarette UseArmsVaping study EC A, Vaping study EC B, Vaping study EC C, Vaping study EC D, Vaping study EC E
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoo Jin ChoCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Marielle C BrinkmanCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Alice HintonCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Jean D NshimiyimanaCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Toral MehtaCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Ayomipo AdenijiCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Kaila NortonCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Ahmad El HellaniCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1047-0597
Theodore L WagenerCenter for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

The Ohio State University Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (OSU-TCORS)U54CA287392 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Peter G. Shields, Theodore Lee Wagener · 2023 to 2026
$19.5M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA287392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesE-cigarettes pose significant risks to youth, but smokers may benefit from switching to e-cigarettes by reducing their exposure to toxicants, which creates a challenge for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in regulating e-cigarettes to protect population health. This study aims to develop e-liquid product standards for nicotine form and concentration that reduce the appeal of e-cigarettes to young people while keeping e-cigarettes available as a safer alternative for smokers. DESIGN AND

participantsA single-visit, double-blinded, randomized crossover design will be used to examine the effects of e-liquids with varying fractions of free-base nicotine (5%, 25%, 45%, 65%, 85%) among a sample of 66 young adult EC users and 66 older adult smokers, across ecologically valid total nicotine concentrations (20 mg or 50 mg/mL). INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: A 2-puff session will be conducted to test each of the 10 e-liquids in randomly assigned sequences, followed by a 10-minute washout period and participant ratings on appeal and sensory attributes such as throat hit and harshness, as well as behavioral intentions for continued use. Generalized linear mixed models will be used to determine a free-base nicotine level that has limited or no appeal to young adult e-cigarette users while remaining acceptable to smokers.

conclusionsThis study will provide the FDA with scientific evidence regarding the effect of product standards that mandate a minimum threshold for the fraction of free-base nicotine.

trial registrationThe study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the identifier NCT05864586.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsNicotineAgedCandyCross-Over StudiesHumansPublic HealthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited StatesYoung AdultNicotine

Identifiers

PMID37699050
PMCPMC10497122
OpenAlexW4386647287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.